Paper · 2020 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

In-Vivo Management of Purple Blotch of Onion Caused by Alternaria porri (Ellis) Cif. through Fungicides

Md. Mozidul Islam; Fatema Begum; Nazmoon Nahar; et al.

13
claims
36
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study the outcome of environmental factors (Temperature, Relative Humidity, Rainfall) and management of the purple blotch disease of onion using five treatments (Rovral + Ridoil gold with 3,4,5,6 sprays and control). The Taherpuri variety was used during the 2015-2016 cropping seasons at BARI, Gazipur, Bangladesh. In the experiment, the purple blotch disease surfaced at the end of January 2016 and was severe in late February to March (PDI 76.12%) due to temperature and RH above 24°C and 95%, respectively. As for the chemical control, the PDI for the treatments ranged from 50.66% to 83.33%. Significantly higher stem height was recorded by T4 (68.06 cm), where six sprays of Rovral + Ridomil were applied. The minimum stem height was recorded in T5 (59.23 cm). The maximum stem number per hill was recorded in T4 (2.30) numerically but differed significantly with T5 (2.00), where fungicides were not applied. The maximum lesion area was measured in T5 (25.26 mm2). Regarding PDI (Percent disease index), there was a significant difference among the treatments. The PDI value on purple blotch of onion ranged from 34.00 to 83.33. The lowest PDI was assessed in T4 (34.00). Statistical analysis revealed that a significant decrease of PDI on purple blotch was recorded under treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (39.20%, 45.60%, 49.59%, and 59.19%) on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield but all of them significantly differed with T5 (83.33%) where no fungicides were sprayed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion purple blotch appeared at the end of January 2016.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
purple blotch diseasee0
Qualifier
end of January 2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the purple blotch disease surfaced at the end of January 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purple blotch was severe in late February to March with PDI 76.12% under high temperature and humidity.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDIe0
Value
76.12%e0
Qualifier
temperature and RH above 24°C and 95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was severe in late February to March (PDI 76.12%) due to temperature and RH above 24°C and 95%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–543 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six fungicide sprays gave significantly higher stem height of 68.06 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
six sprays of Rovral + Ridomile0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
68.06 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher stem height was recorded by T4 (68.06 cm), where six sprays of Rovral + Ridomil were applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had minimum stem height of 59.23 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
59.23 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum stem height was recorded in T5 (59.23 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had maximum stem number per hill, 2.30, significantly differing from unsprayed T5 at 2.00.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
stem number per hille0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.30e0
Qualifier
2.00e0
Comparator
T5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum stem number per hill was recorded in T4 (2.30) numerically but differed significantly with T5 (2.00), where fungicides were not applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unsprayed T5 had the maximum lesion area, 25.26 mm2.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T5e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
lesion areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.26 mm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum lesion area was measured in T5 (25.26 mm2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion purple blotch PDI differed significantly among treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDI (Percent disease index)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding PDI (Percent disease index), there was a significant difference among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the lowest PDI at 34.00.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T4e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
34.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest PDI was assessed in T4 (34.00).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 significantly decreased purple blotch PDI by 39.20% relative to unsprayed T5.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T1e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDI on purple blotche0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
39.20%e0
Comparator
T5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease of PDI on purple blotch was recorded under treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (39.20%, 45.60%, 49.59%, and 59.19%) on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield but all of them significantly differed with T5 (83.33%) where no fungicides were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1528 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 significantly decreased purple blotch PDI by 45.60% relative to unsprayed T5.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T2e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDI on purple blotche0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
45.60%e0
Comparator
T5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease of PDI on purple blotch was recorded under treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (39.20%, 45.60%, 49.59%, and 59.19%) on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield but all of them significantly differed with T5 (83.33%) where no fungicides were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1528 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 significantly decreased purple blotch PDI by 49.59% relative to unsprayed T5.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T3e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDI on purple blotche0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
49.59%e0
Comparator
T5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease of PDI on purple blotch was recorded under treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (39.20%, 45.60%, 49.59%, and 59.19%) on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield but all of them significantly differed with T5 (83.33%) where no fungicides were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1528 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 significantly decreased purple blotch PDI by 59.19% relative to unsprayed T5.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
T4e0
Interactor
Alternaria porriAlternaria porrit0pathogen
Outcome
PDI on purple blotche0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
59.19%e0
Comparator
T5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria porri
Alternaria porri · Interactorhoney-bee from Bangkok, Thailand · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease of PDI on purple blotch was recorded under treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4 (39.20%, 45.60%, 49.59%, and 59.19%) on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield but all of them significantly differed with T5 (83.33%) where no fungicides were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1528 · show in text ↑
e1

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alternaria porri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide treatments were reported to give optimum yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4e1
Outcome
optimum yielde0
Direction
optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on controlling the disease and giving the optimum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1438 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments of T1, T2, T3, and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1345 · show in text ↑
e2

“purple blotch disease of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–171 · show in text ↑

iprodione · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.