Paper · 2020 · Journal of Arid Environments

Salt-tolerant Bacillus species as a promising strategy to mitigate the salinity stress in wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)

Arlett L. Ibarra-Villarreal; Azucena Gándara-Ledezma; América Dafne Godoy-Flores; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
93
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salinity negatively impacts the bacterial diversity associated with crops in commercial fields; however, Bacillus species -due to their great metabolic/genomic background and spore formation-have shown high resilience to this abiotic stress enhancing the tolerance of plants to saline soils. This work aimed to assess the diversity of cultivable salt-tolerant Bacillus species associated with wheat commercial fields in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico, as well as to identify native salt-tolerant Bacillus strains as promising alternatives to mitigate the negative effects of saline soils on wheat. Thus, based on morphological and molecular (sequencing the 16S rRNA gene) traits related to this genus, fifty-one Bacillus strains were isolated from thirty-six 1 ha-wheat commercial fields in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico [soils showed a gradient of electrical conductivity (E.C.) from 0.6 to 6.4 dS m−1]. These strains were grouped into ten Bacillus species: 1) B. subtilis (25.5%), 2) B. megaterium (25.5%), 3) B. cereus (19.6%), 4) B. amyloliquefaciens (7.8%), 5) B. pumilus (5.9), 6) B. licheniformis (5.9%), 7) B. endophyticus (3.92%), 8) B. atrophaeus (1.96%), 9) B. safensis (1.96%), and 10) B. mojavensis (1.96%). The soil salinity in wheat fields (E.C. 0.6–6.4 dS m−1) and the in vitro salt-tolerance assay (E.C. 6.4 dS m−1) negatively impacted the abundance and diversity of Bacillus species; however, B. licheniformis TRQ65 (isolated from soils having 4.1–5.0 dS m−1) showed the highest tolerance to in vitro saline stress (6.4 dS m−1), increasing its growth 223% under saline vs. non-saline conditions. Finally, the inoculation of B. licheniformis TRQ65 was able to mitigate the negative effects of saline soil conditions on wheat (30 days post-inoculation), since the growth promotion of inoculated seedlings under a saline soil condition (6.4 dS m−1) was similar (no significant differences, p > 0.05) to inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline soil condition, which was higher (significant differences, p < 0.05) than un-inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline and saline soil. Bacillus licheniformis TRQ65 (recently taxonomically affiliated as B. paralicheniformis TRQ65) is a promising native salt-tolerant strain that needs to be studied in the future for improving wheat growth and yield, under saline or non-saline soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty-one Bacillus strains from wheat commercial fields were grouped into ten species.

Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
fifty-one Bacillus strainse0
Value
ten Bacillus speciese1
Setting
Yaqui Valley, Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fifty-one Bacillus strains were isolated from thirty-six 1 ha-wheat commercial fields in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“These strains were grouped into ten Bacillus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–946 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salinity and an in vitro salt-tolerance assay negatively impacted Bacillus abundance and diversity.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Interactor
Bacillus speciese0symbiont
Outcome
abundance and diversity of Bacillus speciese0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil salinity in wheat fields (E.C. 0.6–6.4 dS m−1) and the in vitro salt-tolerance assay (E.C. 6.4 dS m−1) negatively impacted the abundance and diversity of Bacillus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. licheniformis TRQ65 showed the highest in vitro saline stress tolerance, with growth increasing 223% under saline versus non-saline conditions.

Interactor
B. licheniformis TRQ65Bacillus licheniformise0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
223%e0
Comparator
non-saline conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis · InteractorStefan Walkowski · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. licheniformis TRQ65 (isolated from soils having 4.1–5.0 dS m−1) showed the highest tolerance to in vitro saline stress (6.4 dS m−1), increasing its growth 223% under saline vs. non-saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth promotion of inoculated wheat seedlings in saline soil was similar to that of inoculated seedlings in non-saline soil.

Treatment
the inoculation of B. licheniformis TRQ65e1
Interactor
B. licheniformis TRQ65Bacillus licheniformise1symbiont
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline soil conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis · InteractorStefan Walkowski · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth promotion of inoculated seedlings under a saline soil condition (6.4 dS m−1) was similar (no significant differences, p > 0.05) to inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline soil condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1967 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“the inoculation of B. licheniformis TRQ65”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat seedlings in saline soil grew more than uninoculated wheat seedlings in non-saline and saline soil.

Treatment
the inoculation of B. licheniformis TRQ65e2
Interactor
B. licheniformis TRQ65Bacillus licheniformise2symbiont
Outcome
growth promotione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
un-inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline and saline soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis · InteractorStefan Walkowski · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was higher (significant differences, p < 0.05) than un-inoculated wheat seedlings under a non-saline and saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2091 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth promotion of inoculated seedlings under a saline soil condition (6.4 dS m−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1852 · show in text ↑
e2

“the inoculation of B. licheniformis TRQ65”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further study of Bacillus licheniformis TRQ65 for improving wheat growth and yield under saline or non-saline soils.

Interactor
Bacillus licheniformis TRQ65Bacillus licheniformise0symbiont
Outcome
improving wheat growth and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis · InteractorStefan Walkowski · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus licheniformis TRQ65 (recently taxonomically affiliated as B. paralicheniformis TRQ65) is a promising native salt-tolerant strain that needs to be studied in the future for improving wheat growth and yield, under saline or non-saline soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2340 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑

Bacillus licheniformis · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.