Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Role of mycorrhizae inoculations on nutrient uptake in rice grown under aerobic and anaerobic water management

Md Toufiq Iqbal; Ibrahim. A. M. Ahmed; Mehmet Isik; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
20
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) inoculums may decline in the rice field due to mostly cultivation of rice under anaerobic or flooded conditions. The mechanisms regulating such events are mainly unknown. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of AMF on the growth response of rice plant, leaf-level photosynthetic behavior, nutrient contents within rice plant tissue and changes in bulk soil physiochemical properties under both aerobic and anaerobic water managements. A pot experiment was conducted under growth chamber conditions. The experimental treatments were control, Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus irregularis × rice variety BRRI Dhan 28 × Turkish Menzilat soil that grown under both aerobic and anaerobic water regimes. The result showed that the width of leaf blade at 12 days after sowing (DAS) was similar between aerobic and anaerobic water management due to mycorrhizae inoculation. Likewise, shoot dry weight at 13 and 35 DAS was similar in both water regimes. However, shoot dry weight at harvest was higher in anaerobic condition than aerobic condition due to F. mosseae mycorrhizae species inoculation. Root biomass gaps were reduced between two managements for mycorrhizae species inoculation. The assimilation rate was tended to be higher in anaerobic than aerobic conditions. In contrast, intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2), stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate were higher in aerobic than anaerobic management. The result also showed that mycorrhizae inoculation increase nutrient concentration within rice plant tissue. Bulk soil physiochemical analysis demonstrated that the bioavailability of nutrients increased in soil solution due to mycorrhizae species inoculation. This study concluded that mycorrhizae can be utilized for rice cultivation under both aerobic and anaerobic water managements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated rice had similar leaf blade width under aerobic and anaerobic management at 12 DAS.

Treatment
mycorrhizae inoculatione0
Outcome
width of leaf bladee0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
12 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Comparator
aerobic and anaerobic water managemente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the width of leaf blade at 12 days after sowing (DAS) was similar between aerobic and anaerobic water management due to mycorrhizae inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated rice had similar shoot dry weight between water regimes at 13 and 35 DAS.

Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
13 and 35 DASe0
Comparator
both water regimese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“shoot dry weight at 13 and 35 DAS was similar in both water regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With F. mosseae inoculation, harvest shoot dry weight was higher under anaerobic than aerobic management.

Treatment
F. mosseae mycorrhizae species inoculatione0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at harveste0
Comparator
aerobic conditione0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot dry weight at harvest was higher in anaerobic condition than aerobic condition due to F. mosseae mycorrhizae species inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation reduced the root biomass gap between water regimes.

Treatment
mycorrhizae species inoculatione0
Outcome
Root biomass gapse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
two managementse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Root biomass gaps were reduced between two managements for mycorrhizae species inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilation rate tended to be higher under anaerobic than aerobic management.

Outcome
assimilation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
tendede0
Comparator
aerobic conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The assimilation rate was tended to be higher in anaerobic than aerobic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1317 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2, stomatal conductance, and transpiration were higher under aerobic management.

Outcome
intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2), stomatal conductance, and transpiration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
anaerobic managemente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2), stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate were higher in aerobic than anaerobic management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased nutrient concentrations in rice tissue.

Treatment
mycorrhizae inoculatione0
Outcome
nutrient concentration within rice plant tissuee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizae inoculation increase nutrient concentration within rice plant tissue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased nutrient bioavailability in bulk soil solution.

Treatment
mycorrhizae species inoculatione0
Outcome
bioavailability of nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bioavailability of nutrients increased in soil solution due to mycorrhizae species inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1723 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that mycorrhizae can support rice cultivation under both water regimes.

Outcome
rice cultivatione0
Qualifier
both aerobic and anaerobic water managementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizae can be utilized for rice cultivation under both aerobic and anaerobic water managements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1850 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

44 papers: 42 positive, 2 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

167 papers: 160 positive, 7 negative or no effect

159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

163 papers more in this group

See all 167 papers →

inoculation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 362 positive, 37 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.