Abstract
The experiment was conducted for two years to find out crops in a rotation which were effective and economical to manage root-knot nematode for green gram based cropping system in root-knot nematode infested field. Green gram, chickpea, wheat, cowpea, cluster bean, cabbage and cauliflower were included in rotation. Green gram and chickpea were susceptible to root-knot nematode therefore; nematode population and root-knot index were maximum in green gram-chickpea-green gram rotation. Green gram-wheat-fallow rotation was found most effective in which nematode population and root-knot index were minimum but this rotation was not found economical. In rotation of green gram-cabbage-cowpea (resistant to root-knot nematode), rootknot nematode population and root-knot index were increased when green gram was taken in kharif but both were decreased in rabi when cabbage (poor host) was taken and they were further decreased when root-knot nematode resistant cowpea was taken. This crop rotation was found effective to manage root-knot nematode with higher income as compared to rest of the rotations. Maximum reduction in root-knot index and final nematode population and increase in yield was recorded in green gram-wheat-fallow rotation. Green gram-cabbage-cluster bean gave maximum income per year and it was 328.21 per cent higher than rootknot nematode susceptible crop rotation i.e. green gram-chickpea-green gram.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram and chickpea were susceptible to root-knot nematode.
- Taxon
- Green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Interactor
- root-knot nematode
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogynee0pathogen - Outcome
- susceptible to root-knot nematodee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Green gram and chickpea were susceptible to root-knot nematode”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–chickpea–green gram rotation had maximum nematode population and root-knot index.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- green gram-chickpea-green gram rotatione0
- Outcome
- nematode population and root-knot indexe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nematode population and root-knot index were maximum in green gram-chickpea-green gram rotation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–wheat–fallow had minimum nematode population and root-knot index.
- Taxon
- Green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- Green gram-wheat-fallow rotatione0
- Outcome
- nematode population and root-knot indexe0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green gram-wheat-fallow rotation was found most effective in which nematode population and root-knot index were minimum”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–wheat–fallow was not economical.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Outcome
- not found economicale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this rotation was not found economical.”
t0“subsequent greengram crop”
Claim · model-written summary
In green gram–cabbage–cowpea rotation, nematode population and root-knot index increased during kharif green gram.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- green gram-cabbage-cowpeae0
- Interactor
- root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
- Outcome
- rootknot nematode population and root-knot indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In rotation of green gram-cabbage-cowpea (resistant to root-knot nematode), rootknot nematode population and root-knot index were increased when green gram was taken in kharif”
Claim · model-written summary
In the same rotation, nematode population and root-knot index decreased during the cabbage phase.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- cabbage (poor host)e0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynet0pathogen
- Outcome
- bothe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both were decreased in rabi when cabbage (poor host) was taken”
t0“Meloidogyne spp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode population and root-knot index decreased further under resistant cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- root-knot nematode resistant cowpeae0
- Interactor
- root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
- Outcome
- root-knot nematodee0
- Direction
- further decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they were further decreased when root-knot nematode resistant cowpea was taken.”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–cabbage–cowpea rotation managed nematodes and had higher income than other rotations.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- crop rotatione0
- Interactor
- root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
- Outcome
- incomee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- rest of the rotationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This crop rotation was found effective to manage root-knot nematode with higher income as compared to rest of the rotations.”
t0“subsequent greengram crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–wheat–fallow gave the greatest reduction in root-knot index and final nematode population.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- green gram-wheat-fallow rotatione0
- Outcome
- root-knot index and final nematode populatione0
- Direction
- Maximum reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum reduction in root-knot index and final nematode population and increase in yield was recorded in green gram-wheat-fallow rotation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–wheat–fallow increased yield.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- green gram-wheat-fallow rotatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increase in yield was recorded in green gram-wheat-fallow rotation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram–cabbage–cluster bean produced maximum annual income, 328.21 percent more than the susceptible rotation.
- Taxon
- Green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- Green gram-cabbage-cluster beane0
- Outcome
- income per yeare0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 328.21 per cente0
- Comparator
- green gram-chickpea-green grame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Green gram-cabbage-cluster bean gave maximum income per year and it was 328.21 per cent higher than rootknot nematode susceptible crop rotation i.e. green gram-chickpea-green gram.”
The same questions in other papers
rotation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.