Paper · 2020 · Žemės ūkio mokslai

Concentration effect of polyethylene glycol in evaluation of grain legumes for drought tolerance

Nadiia Vus; Antonina Vasylenko; Vyacheslav Lutenko; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article covers selection of differentiating concentrations of PEG-6000 for assessing genetic resource collections of pea, chickpea and lentil. The germinability of 4 accessions of each crop in 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% PEG-6000 solutions was evaluated. The results showed that 25% PEG-6000 completely inhibited growth processes in all the crops; 5 and 10% PEG-6000 did not affect the germinability of lentil seeds; and the maximum differentiation was observed at an osmotic concentration of 20%. In chickpea, there were no seedlings even in 20% PEG-6000. In 15% PEG-6000, seeds of drought-tolerant accessions UD0500022 and Dnіprovskyi Vysokoroslyi only sprouted; and 5 and 10% solutions had the maximum differentiating effect. Pea germination in PEG-6000 solutions of different concentrations demonstrated that only one accession could germinate in 20 and 15% solutions. Two accessions gave seedlings in 10% PEG-6000, and 5% solution had almost no effect on the germinability of pea seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% PEG, growth was completely inhibited in all three crops.

Treatment
25% PEG-6000e0
Outcome
growth processese0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% PEG-6000 completely inhibited growth processes in all the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea, chickpea and lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five percent PEG did not affect lentil germinability.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
5 and 10% PEG-6000e0
Outcome
germinability of lentil seedse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 and 10% PEG-6000 did not affect the germinability of lentil seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–413 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum differentiation among lentil accessions occurred at 20% osmotic concentration.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Outcome
maximum differentiatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum differentiation was observed at an osmotic concentration of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“germinability of lentil seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea had no seedlings at 20% PEG.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
20% PEG-6000e0
Outcome
no seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In chickpea, there were no seedlings even in 20% PEG-6000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 15% PEG only the named tolerant chickpea accessions sprouted.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
UD0500022 and Dnіprovskyi Vysokoroslyie0
Treatment
15% PEG-6000e0
Outcome
sproutede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 15% PEG-6000, seeds of drought-tolerant accessions UD0500022 and Dnіprovskyi Vysokoroslyi only sprouted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“In chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–507 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five and ten percent PEG had the greatest differentiation among chickpea accessions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
maximum differentiating effecte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5 and 10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 and 10% solutions had the maximum differentiating effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“In chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one pea accession germinated at 20% and 15% PEG.

Treatment
20 and 15% solutionse0
Outcome
one accession could germinatee0
Value
one accessione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only one accession could germinate in 20 and 15% solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea germination in PEG-6000 solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–764 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two pea accessions had seedlings in 10% PEG.

Treatment
10% PEG-6000e0
Outcome
seedlingse0
Value
Two accessionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two accessions gave seedlings in 10% PEG-6000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five percent PEG had almost no effect on pea seed germinability.

Treatment
5% solutione0
Outcome
germinability of pea seedse0
Direction
almost no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5% solution had almost no effect on the germinability of pea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–988 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

38 papers: 9 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

drought · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 9 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

drought · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 6 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.