Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF SEED CLASSES, HARVESTING DATES AND STORAGE PERIODS ON YIELD AND SEED QUALITY OF WHEAT

M. Badawi; A. Salama; I. Mersal; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted at the Experimental Farm of Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Egypt during 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons. The aim of the first experiment, was to study the effect of harvesting dates 45, 55, 65 and 75 days from 50% heading under three wheat seed classes (foundation, registered and certified) on yield and its components (c.v. Giza168). The second experiment was conducted at the laboratory of Seed Technology Research Unit, El-Mansoura, Dakahlia Governorate and aimed to study the effect of harvesting dates and wheat seed classes seed quality during different storage periods, i.e. (0, 3 and 6 months after harvesting). The results revealed that, harvesting dates had significant effects on grains moisture content, number of spikes/m2, spike weight, number of spikeletes/ spike, number of grains/spike, grains spike weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield. Harvesting wheat plants after 65 day from 50% heading produced the highest means yield and its components traits i.e. (spikes number/m2, 1000-seed weight, grain yield) in both seasons. Result showed that insignificant differences among seed classes on growth characters, yield and its components. In general, number of spike/m2, spike length, number of spikeletes/spike, number of grain/spike and grain yield were recorded maximum value from foundation seed followed by registered and certified seed category. Increasing storage periods had significant effect on all the studied traits. While the prolong the storage periods from 0 to 6 months from storage lead to the decrease in germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy and germination rate and the decrease in seedling vigor traits (seedling length and fresh and dry weight) and carbohydrate percentage in the both seasons. While this increase in storage period lead to the increase in mean germination time, protein content, insect infection percentage and seed dry weight loss percentage in the first and second seasons. Harvesting dates significantly affected on germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, insect infection percentage, seed dry weight loss, protein content and carbohydrate percentage in the first and second seasons. While it had different effects on speed of germination only in the first season. The interaction among storage periods, harvesting date and seed classes had a significant effect on germination energy and seedling fresh weight in the first and second seasons and seedling dry weight in the first season only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected grain moisture, spike number and spike weight.

Treatment
harvesting datese0
Outcome
grains moisture content, number of spikes/m2, spike weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting dates had significant effects on grains moisture content, number of spikes/m2, spike weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected spikelet number, grain number and grain spike weight.

Treatment
harvesting datese0
Outcome
number of spikeletes/ spike, number of grains/spike, grains spike weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting dates had significant effects on grains moisture content, number of spikes/m2, spike weight, number of spikeletes/ spike, number of grains/spike, grains spike weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected 1000-grain weight and grain yield.

Treatment
harvesting datese0
Outcome
1000-grain weight and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvesting dates had significant effects on grains moisture content, number of spikes/m2, spike weight, number of spikeletes/ spike, number of grains/spike, grains spike weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 65 days from 50% heading gave the highest spike number, 1000-seed weight and grain yield in both seasons.

Treatment
after 65 day from 50% headinge0
Outcome
spikes number/m2, 1000-seed weight, grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting wheat plants after 65 day from 50% heading produced the highest means yield and its components traits i.e. (spikes number/m2, 1000-seed weight, grain yield) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed classes did not differ significantly in growth characters, yield or yield components.

Treatment
seed classese0
Outcome
growth characters, yield and its componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result showed that insignificant differences among seed classes on growth characters, yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foundation seed had the maximum spike number, spike length and spikelet number, followed by registered and certified seed.

Treatment
foundation seede0
Outcome
number of spike/m2, spike length, number of spikeletes/spikee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
registered and certified seed categorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, number of spike/m2, spike length, number of spikeletes/spike, number of grain/spike and grain yield were recorded maximum value from foundation seed followed by registered and certified seed category.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foundation seed had the maximum grains per spike and grain yield, followed by registered and certified seed.

Treatment
foundation seede0
Outcome
number of grain/spike and grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
registered and certified seed categorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, number of spike/m2, spike length, number of spikeletes/spike, number of grain/spike and grain yield were recorded maximum value from foundation seed followed by registered and certified seed category.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing storage significantly affected all studied traits.

Treatment
Increasing storage periodse0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing storage periods had significant effect on all the studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage from 0 to 6 months decreased germination percentage, speed and energy in both seasons.

Treatment
storage periods from 0 to 6 monthse0
Outcome
germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the prolong the storage periods from 0 to 6 months from storage lead to the decrease in germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy and germination rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged storage decreased germination rate.

Treatment
storage periods from 0 to 6 monthse0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the prolong the storage periods from 0 to 6 months from storage lead to the decrease in germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy and germination rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged storage decreased seedling length and fresh and dry weights.

Treatment
storage periods from 0 to 6 monthse0
Outcome
seedling length and fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the prolong the storage periods from 0 to 6 months from storage lead to the decrease in germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy and germination rate and the decrease in seedling vigor traits (seedling length and fresh and dry weight) and carbohydrate percentage in the both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged storage decreased carbohydrate percentage in both seasons.

Treatment
storage periods from 0 to 6 monthse0
Outcome
carbohydrate percentagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the prolong the storage periods from 0 to 6 months from storage lead to the decrease in germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy and germination rate and the decrease in seedling vigor traits (seedling length and fresh and dry weight) and carbohydrate percentage in the both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1827 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing storage increased mean germination time and protein content in both seasons.

Treatment
increase in storage periode0
Outcome
mean germination time, protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increase in storage period lead to the increase in mean germination time, protein content, insect infection percentage and seed dry weight loss percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2026 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing storage increased insect infection and seed dry weight loss percentages in both seasons.

Treatment
increase in storage periode0
Interactor
insecte0pest
Outcome
insect infection percentage and seed dry weight loss percentagee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increase in storage period lead to the increase in mean germination time, protein content, insect infection percentage and seed dry weight loss percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2026 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected germination energy and rate and seedling fresh weight in both seasons.

Treatment
Harvesting datese0
Outcome
germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weighte0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting dates significantly affected on germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, insect infection percentage, seed dry weight loss, protein content and carbohydrate percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2279 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected seedling dry weight in both seasons.

Treatment
Harvesting datese0
Outcome
seedling dry weighte0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting dates significantly affected on germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, insect infection percentage, seed dry weight loss, protein content and carbohydrate percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2279 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected insect infection percentage and seed dry weight loss in both seasons.

Treatment
Harvesting datese0
Interactor
insecte0pest
Outcome
insect infection percentage, seed dry weight losse0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting dates significantly affected on germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, insect infection percentage, seed dry weight loss, protein content and carbohydrate percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2279 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates significantly affected protein and carbohydrate contents in both seasons.

Treatment
Harvesting datese0
Outcome
protein content and carbohydrate percentagee0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting dates significantly affected on germination energy, germination rate, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, insect infection percentage, seed dry weight loss, protein content and carbohydrate percentage in the first and second seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2279 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting dates affected germination speed only in the first season.

Treatment
Harvesting datese0
Outcome
speed of germinatione1
Qualifier
only in the first seasone1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting dates significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2066 · show in text ↑
e1

“While it had different effects on speed of germination only in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2280–2360 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage, harvest date and seed class interactions significantly affected germination energy and seedling fresh weight in both seasons, and seedling dry weight only in the first.

Treatment
interaction among storage periods, harvesting date and seed classese0
Outcome
germination energy and seedling fresh weighte0
Qualifier
in the first and second seasons and seedling dry weight in the first season onlye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction among storage periods, harvesting date and seed classes had a significant effect on germination energy and seedling fresh weight in the first and second seasons and seedling dry weight in the first season only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2361–2587 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

storage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat seed stored in a refrigerator had the highest germination percentage

    Effect of storage containers and time on seed quality of wheat · 1970 · compared with polyethylene bag, tin container and earthen pitcher

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.