Paper · 2020 · Foods

Application of Plant Extracts to Control Postharvest Gray Mold and Susceptibility of Apple Fruits to B. cinerea from Different Plant Hosts

Lina Šernaitė; Neringa Rasiukevičiūtė; Alma Valiuškaitė

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
56
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable plant protection can be applied on apples against fungal pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea (which is responsible for gray mold)—a significant global postharvest disease. This pathogen can affect a wide range of hosts; and fruits may have variable susceptibilities to B. cinerea from different plant hosts. New possibilities to control gray mold in food production are under demand due to the emergence of resistance against antifungal agents in fungal pathogens. Cinnamon, pimento, and laurel extracts were previously assessed for antifungal activities under in vitro conditions and were found to have the potential to be effective against postharvest gray mold. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the antifungal activity of cinnamon, pimento, and laurel extracts in vitro and against postharvest gray mold on apples to determine the susceptibility of apple fruits to B. cinerea from different plant hosts, and to analyze the chemical composition of the extracts. Apples (cv. “Connell Red”) were treated with different concentrations of extracts and inoculated with B. cinerea isolates from apple and strawberry followed by evaluation of in vitro antifungal activity. The results reveal that most of the concentrations of the extracts that were investigated were not efficient enough when assessed in the postharvest assay, despite having demonstrated a high in vitro antifungal effect. Apples were less susceptible to B. cinerea isolated from strawberry. To conclude, cinnamon extract was found to be the most effective against apple gray mold; however, higher concentrations of the extracts are required for the efficient inhibition of B. cinerea in fruits during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most concentrations of the plant extracts were not efficient enough in the postharvest assay on apples.

Treatment
extractse1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
postharvest assaye1
Direction
not efficient enoughe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of Apple Fruits to B. cinerea from Different Plant Hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“most of the concentrations of the extracts that were investigated were not efficient enough when assessed in the postharvest assay, despite having demonstrated a high in vitro antifungal effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cinnamon extract was the most effective against apple gray mold.

Treatment
cinnamon extracte2
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
apple gray molde2
Direction
most effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of Apple Fruits to B. cinerea from Different Plant Hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
e2

“cinnamon extract was found to be the most effective against apple gray mold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1565 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples were less susceptible to B. cinerea isolated from strawberry than to other isolates.

Material
isolated from strawberrye0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of Apple Fruits to B. cinerea from Different Plant Hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
e0

“Apples were less susceptible to B. cinerea isolated from strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extracts had a high in vitro antifungal effect against B. cinerea.

Treatment
extractse1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
in vitro antifungal effecte1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Susceptibility of Apple Fruits to B. cinerea from Different Plant Hosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“most of the concentrations of the extracts that were investigated were not efficient enough when assessed in the postharvest assay, despite having demonstrated a high in vitro antifungal effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1406 · show in text ↑

Cinnamomum verum · Botrytis cinerea · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Botrytis cinerea · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.