Abstract
Cotton, the major fibre crop of India grown mainly under the rainfed condition often faces multi-nutritional deficiencies. This experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2016-17 on to find out the best performing nutrient combination for rainfed cotton in which sulphur, zinc and FYM based nutrient management regime, as well as customized fertilizer, were evaluated. The result indicated that gradually adding sulphur and zinc along with compulsory nitrogen, phosphorus and potassic fertilizer improves yield and quality attributes, however, significantly higher yield attributes, yield and quality has been observed when farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectare has been used along with standard recommended dose of fertilizers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Adding sulphur and zinc to NPK fertilization improved cotton yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- adding sulphur and zinc along with compulsory nitrogen, phosphorus and potassic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“gradually adding sulphur and zinc along with compulsory nitrogen, phosphorus and potassic fertilizer improves yield and quality attributes”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding sulphur and zinc to NPK fertilization improved cotton quality attributes.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- adding sulphur and zinc along with compulsory nitrogen, phosphorus and potassic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- quality attributese0
- Direction
- improvese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“gradually adding sulphur and zinc along with compulsory nitrogen, phosphorus and potassic fertilizer improves yield and quality attributes”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure at five tonnes per hectare with recommended fertilizers significantly increased cotton yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectaree0
- Outcome
- yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yield attributes, yield and quality has been observed when farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectare has been used along with standard recommended dose of fertilizers”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure at five tonnes per hectare with recommended fertilizers significantly increased cotton yield.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectaree0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yield attributes, yield and quality has been observed when farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectare has been used along with standard recommended dose of fertilizers”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure at five tonnes per hectare with recommended fertilizers significantly increased cotton quality.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectaree0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yield attributes, yield and quality has been observed when farmyard manure at a rate of five tonnes per hectare has been used along with standard recommended dose of fertilizers”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →zinc atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →sulfur atom · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
zinc atom · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →phosphorus · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
nitrogen · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.