Paper · 2011 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

The effect of zinc application methods on seed cotton yield, lint and seed quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in east Mediterranean region of Turkey

Efe Lale; Yarpuz Emine

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of different zinc application methods on seed cotton yield, yield components, lint and seed quality of cotton was investigated under east Mediterranean region conditions (Kahramanmaras, Turkey) in 2008. Experimental design was split plots with three replications. The cotton varieties: Agdas-3, Agdas-17 and Maras-92 (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were plant materials. Zinc application treatments were seed, soil surface, foliar application and untreated control. A commercial preparation of chelated zinc (EDTA Zn-17 %) was used as zinc fertilizer. It was determined that zinc application methods did not affect yield and yield components except plant height. While zinc application methods had no effect on lint quality traits except spinning consistency index (SCI), elongation and yellowness (+b), which are the best values, were taken from the soil surface and foliar application of zinc and control for spinning consistency index, and from the foliar application of zinc for yellowness. On the other hand, zinc application methods did not affect raw oil and protein ratio of cotton seeds, as well as the zinc content of cotton seeds and leaves. When the pH, organic matter, lime content and soil texture were taken into consideration, decreasing of pH value and lime content of soil and increasing of organic matter together with zinc fertilization in the experimental field were suggested. Key words: Cotton, zinc (Zn) fertilizer, application methods, seed cotton yield, lint quality, seed quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc methods did not affect cotton yield or yield components except plant height.

Treatment
zinc application methodse0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
except plant heighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was determined that zinc application methods did not affect yield and yield components except plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc methods affected plant height.

Treatment
zinc application methodse0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was determined that zinc application methods did not affect yield and yield components except plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc methods did not affect lint quality traits apart from SCI, elongation and yellowness.

Treatment
zinc application methodse0
Outcome
lint quality traitse0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
except spinning consistency index (SCI), elongation and yellowness (+b)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application methods had no effect on lint quality traits except spinning consistency index (SCI), elongation and yellowness (+b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-surface and foliar zinc application and control gave the best spinning consistency index.

Treatment
soil surface and foliar application of zince0
Outcome
spinning consistency indexe0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best values, were taken from the soil surface and foliar application of zinc and control for spinning consistency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application gave the best yellowness value.

Treatment
foliar application of zince0
Outcome
yellownesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from the foliar application of zinc for yellowness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods did not affect seed raw oil or protein ratio.

Treatment
zinc application methodse0
Outcome
raw oil and protein ratio of cotton seedse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application methods did not affect raw oil and protein ratio of cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods did not affect seed or leaf zinc content.

Treatment
zinc application methodse0
Outcome
zinc content of cotton seeds and leavese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application methods did not affect raw oil and protein ratio of cotton seeds, as well as the zinc content of cotton seeds and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zinc fertilization together with lower soil pH and lime and higher organic matter.

Outcome
decreasing of pH value and lime content of soil and increasing of organic matter together with zinc fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing of pH value and lime content of soil and increasing of organic matter together with zinc fertilization in the experimental field were suggested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.