Paper · 2020 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Marine and fungal biostimulants improve grain yield, nitrogen absorption and allocation in durum wheat plants

Eve-Anne Laurent; Nawel Ahmed; Céline Durieu; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Durum wheat culture requires a high level of N fertilization to achieve ideal protein concentration for semolina and pasta quality, contributing to N losses. Optimizing plant N use efficiency could improve agro-environmental balance. In the current paper, we studied the impact of the marine (DPI4913) and fungal (AF086) extracts (biostimulants) applied on leaves on growth, N absorption and N fluxes in durum wheat in field and greenhouse experiments. In the field, 15 NO 3 − and 15 NH 4 + were injected into the soil; in the greenhouse, N of the flag-leaf was labelled with 15 NH 4 + . Flag-leaf senescence was studied by estimating leaf chlorophyll concentration. In greenhouse, biostimulants increased grain yield, total N in plant and the proportion of plant N in ears. When water was limited in greenhouse experiment, neither biostimulants had any effect. In the field, DPI4913 increased soil fertilizer-derived 15 N accumulated in grains. In the greenhouse, biostimulants increased the proportion of 15 N applied to the flag-leaf recovered in grains and accelerated leaf senescence. For plants treated with biostimulants, flag-leaf N resorption increased. Biostimulants had a larger positive impact on mineral N root uptake than on N remobilization. In conclusion, our study has shown that DPI4913 and AF086 can promote plant growth and grain yield, N uptake and remobilization. Thus, these biostimulants could be used to optimize durum wheat N fertilization and contribute to reduced N losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, biostimulants increased grain yield.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse, biostimulants increased grain yield, total N in plant and the proportion of plant N in ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, biostimulants increased total N in plant.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
total N in plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse, biostimulants increased grain yield, total N in plant and the proportion of plant N in ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, biostimulants increased the proportion of plant N in ears.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
the proportion of plant N in earse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse, biostimulants increased grain yield, total N in plant and the proportion of plant N in ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited water in the greenhouse, neither biostimulant had an effect.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
any effecte0
Qualifier
water was limitede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When water was limited in greenhouse experiment, neither biostimulants had any effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of DPI4913 increased fertilizer-derived nitrogen in grains.

Treatment
DPI4913e0
Outcome
soil fertilizer-derived 15 N accumulated in grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, DPI4913 increased soil fertilizer-derived 15 N accumulated in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, biostimulants increased recovery of flag-leaf nitrogen in grains.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
the proportion of 15 N applied to the flag-leaf recovered in grainse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, biostimulants increased the proportion of 15 N applied to the flag-leaf recovered in grains and accelerated leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, biostimulants accelerated flag-leaf senescence.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, biostimulants increased the proportion of 15 N applied to the flag-leaf recovered in grains and accelerated leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants increased flag-leaf nitrogen resorption.

Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
flag-leaf N resorptione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For plants treated with biostimulants, flag-leaf N resorption increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants affected mineral nitrogen root uptake more than nitrogen remobilization.

Treatment
Biostimulantse0
Outcome
mineral N root uptakee0
Direction
larger positive impacte0
Comparator
N remobilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biostimulants had a larger positive impact on mineral N root uptake than on N remobilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose biostimulants to optimize durum wheat nitrogen fertilization and reduce nitrogen losses.

Outcome
optimize durum wheat N fertilization and contribute to reduced N lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these biostimulants could be used to optimize durum wheat N fertilization and contribute to reduced N losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1509 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.