Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Cultivation of tuberose in pot and field with humic acid treatments under a semi-arid climate

Hadi Ghasemi; Mehdi Rezaei; Hamid-Reza Asghari; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to find a suitable way for tuberose cultivation in cool and dry climates and study the effects of humic acid on growth, a factorial experiment was carried out based on a complete block design with three replications. Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot. Three levels of humic acid (0, 2.5 and 5 kg/ha) were applied. Results showed that number of bulbs, number of side bulblets and main bulbs weight were significantly increased in the field culture system in comparison with greenhouse. However, characteristics such as leaf area, floret diameter, bud diameter, rachis length and flowering percentage were significantly higher in pot culture. Humic acid application (2.5 and 5 kg/ha) improved some of the important characteristics such as flowering percentage in pot system and main bulb weight and total bulbs weight in field cultivation. Application of humic acid in pot culture was found as suitable cultivation system to enhance the flowering percentage. However, field culture system was more effective in bulb production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of bulbs, side bulblets and main bulb weight increased in the field culture system compared with greenhouse.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
field culture systeme1
Outcome
number of bulbs, number of side bulblets and main bulbs weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that number of bulbs, number of side bulblets and main bulbs weight were significantly increased in the field culture system in comparison with greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, floret diameter and bud diameter were higher in pot culture.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
pot culturee2
Outcome
leaf area, floret diameter, bud diametere2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e2

“characteristics such as leaf area, floret diameter, bud diameter, rachis length and flowering percentage were significantly higher in pot culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rachis length and flowering percentage were higher in pot culture.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
pot culturee2
Outcome
rachis length and flowering percentagee2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e2

“characteristics such as leaf area, floret diameter, bud diameter, rachis length and flowering percentage were significantly higher in pot culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 2.5 and 5 kg/ha improved flowering percentage in pot culture.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
Humic acid application (2.5 and 5 kg/ha)e3
Outcome
flowering percentagee3
Direction
improvede3
Setting
pot systeme3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Humic acid application (2.5 and 5 kg/ha) improved some of the important characteristics such as flowering percentage in pot system and main bulb weight and total bulbs weight in field cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 2.5 and 5 kg/ha improved main bulb weight and total bulb weight in field cultivation.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
Humic acid application (2.5 and 5 kg/ha)e3
Outcome
main bulb weight and total bulbs weighte3
Direction
improvede3
Setting
field cultivatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Humic acid application (2.5 and 5 kg/ha) improved some of the important characteristics such as flowering percentage in pot system and main bulb weight and total bulbs weight in field cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–889 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application in pot culture was found suitable to enhance flowering percentage (author recommendation).

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
Application of humic acide4
Outcome
flowering percentagee4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of humic acid in pot culture was found as suitable cultivation system to enhance the flowering percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field culture system was more effective in bulb production.

Taxon
TuberoseAgave amicae0
Material
cv. Doublee0
Treatment
field culture systeme5
Outcome
bulb productione5
Direction
more effectivee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuberose cv. Double was cultivated in two culture systems, i.e. field and pot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, field culture system was more effective in bulb production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1077 · show in text ↑

in vitro · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · phenology · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.