Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Biological control of tomato damping off caused by Rhizoctonia solani

M Rajendraprasad; B. Vidyasagar; G Uma Devi; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In vitro evaluation was conducted with twenty four isolates representing two different species Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride and twelve different Baccillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescence. These potential biocontrol agents were tested for their efficacy against phytopathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia solani through dual culture technique. Therefore, these effective biocontrol agents can be used for greenhouse studies to confirm the feasibility of using in tomato damping off disease management. The lowest incidence (38.33 per cent) of pre emergence damping off was recorded in T6 (seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1). Among the bio-control treatments the lowest (43.75 and 48.33) post emergence damping off incidence was recorded in T6 (seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1) at 30 and 50 DAS. The combination Trichoderma harzianum -1and Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 bacterial biocontrol agents (T5 and T6) treatment also proved effective in increasing the shoot and root weight and fresh and dry weight of tomato plants when inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the lowest pre emergence damping off incidence, 38.33 per cent.

Treatment
seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescence-2e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pre emergence damping offe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
38.33 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest incidence (38.33 per cent) of pre emergence damping off was recorded in T6 (seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato damping off caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 and Trichoderma harzianum -1 had the lowest post emergence damping off incidence at 30 DAS, 43.75.

Treatment
seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescence-3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
post emergence damping off incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
43.75e0
Qualifier
30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (43.75 and 48.33) post emergence damping off incidence was recorded in T6 (seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1) at 30 and 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato damping off caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the lowest post emergence damping off incidence at 50 DAS, 48.33.

Treatment
seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescence-3e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
post emergence damping off incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
48.33e0
Qualifier
50 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (43.75 and 48.33) post emergence damping off incidence was recorded in T6 (seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence-3 + soil application with Trichoderma harzianum -1) at 30 and 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato damping off caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Trichoderma and Pseudomonas combination increased shoot and root weight and fresh and dry weight in Rhizoctonia inoculated tomato.

Treatment
The combination Trichoderma harzianum -1and Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 bacterial biocontrol agents (T5 and T6) treatmente0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianum -1Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot and root weight and fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination Trichoderma harzianum -1and Pseudomonas fluorescence-2 bacterial biocontrol agents (T5 and T6) treatment also proved effective in increasing the shoot and root weight and fresh and dry weight of tomato plants when inoculated with Rhizoctonia solani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1198 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend greenhouse study of the agents for tomato damping off management.

Outcome
greenhouse studies to confirm the feasibility of using in tomato damping off disease managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these effective biocontrol agents can be used for greenhouse studies to confirm the feasibility of using in tomato damping off disease management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–512 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.