Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Bioefficacy of new insecticide molecules against sugarcane early shoot borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) (Pyralidae; Lepidoptera)

Mahesh B Hajare; M. P. Badgujar; CK Gajare

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Regional Sugarcane and Jaggary Research Station, Kolhapur during 2015-16 to evaluate relative efficacy of new insecticide molecules against sugarcane early shoot borers Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen). Eight insecticides namely, Fipronil 0.3% GR, Chlorantraniliprole 0.4% GR,Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, Fipronil 5% SC, Spinosad 45% SC, Flubendiamide M/M 39.35% SC, Phorate 10% CG, Carbofuran 3% CG were compared with untreated (Check plot). Significant differences were noticed among the treatments. All chemicals recorded significantly less cumulative incidence per cent against early shoot borer (8.20 to 27.36%); more average millable canes (74.19 to 97.22 thousand / ha) and cane yield 87.04 to 118.98 t /ha) as compared to untreated control (32.55%, 71.06 thousand / ha and 81.02 t/ha respectively). The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha). The next best superior treatments found for reducing early shoot borer incidence were Fipronil 0.3% GR and Carbofuran 3% CG.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All chemicals lowered cumulative borer incidence to 8.20 to 27.36% versus 32.55% in untreated plots.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
All chemicalse0
Outcome
cumulative incidence per cent against early shoot borere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
8.20 to 27.36%e0
Qualifier
32.55%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All chemicals recorded significantly less cumulative incidence per cent against early shoot borer (8.20 to 27.36%); more average millable canes (74.19 to 97.22 thousand / ha) and cane yield 87.04 to 118.98 t /ha) as compared to untreated control (32.55%, 71.06 thousand / ha and 81.02 t/ha respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All chemicals increased millable canes to 74.19 to 97.22 thousand / ha versus 71.06 thousand / ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
All chemicalse0
Outcome
average millable canese0
Direction
moree0
Value
74.19 to 97.22 thousand / hae0
Qualifier
71.06 thousand / hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All chemicals recorded significantly less cumulative incidence per cent against early shoot borer (8.20 to 27.36%); more average millable canes (74.19 to 97.22 thousand / ha) and cane yield 87.04 to 118.98 t /ha) as compared to untreated control (32.55%, 71.06 thousand / ha and 81.02 t/ha respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All chemicals increased cane yield to 87.04 to 118.98 t /ha versus 81.02 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
All chemicalse0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
87.04 to 118.98 t /hae0
Qualifier
81.02 t/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All chemicals recorded significantly less cumulative incidence per cent against early shoot borer (8.20 to 27.36%); more average millable canes (74.19 to 97.22 thousand / ha) and cane yield 87.04 to 118.98 t /ha) as compared to untreated control (32.55%, 71.06 thousand / ha and 81.02 t/ha respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole soil treatment had least borer incidence, 8.20%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
early shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
8.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole spray had borer incidence of 11.60%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
early shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
11.60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole soil treatment produced 97.22 thousand / ha millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
average millable canese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
97.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole spray produced 94.56 thousand / ha millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
average millable canese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
94.56 thousand / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole soil treatment yielded 118.98 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
118.98e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole spray yielded 112.96 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after plantinge0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
112.96 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of chlorantraniliprole 0.4 GR at the time of planting and 60 days after planting followed by spraying of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC at 30 and 60 days after planting are statistically at par and recorded least early shoot borer incidence (8.20 and 11.60%), maximum average millable canes (97.22 and 94.56 thousand / ha) and cane yield (118.98 and 112.96 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 0.3% GR was a next best treatment for reducing borer incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Fipronil 0.3% GRe0
Outcome
early shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The next best superior treatments found for reducing early shoot borer incidence were Fipronil 0.3% GR and Carbofuran 3% CG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran 3% CG was a next best treatment for reducing borer incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Carbofuran 3% CGe0
Outcome
early shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The next best superior treatments found for reducing early shoot borer incidence were Fipronil 0.3% GR and Carbofuran 3% CG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fipronil · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · disease · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.