Paper · 2018 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Optimizing Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Daily Light Integral Combination in a Multi-Level Electrically Lighted Lettuce Production System

Brian Akira Caplan

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There are many issues that will make producing sufficient food for the growing global population a difficult task. Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA), integrating environmental control and hydroponic technology, can efficiently produce more food with less inputs. The new production practices of vertical farms have precision environmental control and subsequently more consistent and higher productivity with the advantage of being located almost anywhere, especially closer to population centers. A vertical Farm can be described as a fully indoor production system that uses electrical lamps for photosynthetic lighting and high density crops grown in multiple layers. CEA technology of supplementing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in greenhouse applications to compensate for low light levels, maintain plant photosynthesis, and enhance profits is practiced. However, due to the amount of ventilation generally required in greenhouse environments, maintaining CO2 concentrations can be expensive and impractical. The closed configuration of vertical farms can enhance CO2 use efficiency, however, the use of electrical lighting results in a large electrical power requirement. The goal of this study was to evaluate the level of daily light integrals (DLI) and atmospheric CO2 concentrations that would provide savings of electrical power usage and CO2 supplementation while producing a marketable head lettuce (Butterhead, cv. Fairly) product. Experiments were conducted in a 45 m2 environmentally controlled (air temperature, PPF, DLI, CO2, DO, EC and pH) vertical farm research facility with six values of DLI (9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19 mol m-2 d-1) and six CO2 concentrations (400, 550, 700, 850, 1000, 1300 ppm), which were maintained constant from transplant through harvest. Plant shoot fresh and dry weights were measured at harvest and compared with resource use accounting of electrical energy for LED lighting, heat pumps for air conditioning, water pumps for nutrient solution circulation, and air pump to maintain dissolved oxygen in the nutrient solution for the roots. It was demonstrated that 1) a linear relationship of increase biomass to increase of DLI existed for all treatments; 2) plants within the 850 ppm CO2 concentration yielded the largest average fresh and dry shoot weights and yields decreased as CO2 was further elevated; 3) the physiological disorder tip burn was more pervasive and appeared sooner for either larger CO2 concentrations and larger DLIs. No tip burn was observed at 400 and 550 ppm CO2 concentrations within any DLI; 4) lettuce grown in lower light intensities had larger physical size dimensions, but were less dense and had less biomass, compared to lettuce grown in higher light intensities which had a smaller physical dimension, but were more dense and thus greater biomass; 5) the metrics for the average overall resource use efficiencies of plant production for fresh weight edible biomass were 69 gfresh kWh-1, 147 gfresh LCO2-1, 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1 , and 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1; 6) the potential electrical savings from changing the DLI (mol m-2 d-1)/CO2 (ppm) combination from 17/400 to 13/850 in the small scale research facility, to which this study was conducted, is $59 per harvest and $762 for the year (14.4% savings). Larger commercial vertical farm operations lowering the DLI and increasing CO2 concentrations could have a much greater electrical savings potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass rose linearly with DLI across treatments.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
DLIe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a linear relationship of increase biomass to increase of DLI existed for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 850 ppm CO2, fresh and dry shoot weights were largest.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
850 ppm CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
fresh and dry shoot weightse0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants within the 850 ppm CO2 concentration yielded the largest average fresh and dry shoot weights and yields decreased as CO2 was further elevated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2212–2360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield declined with CO2 above 850 ppm.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
CO2 was further elevatede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
850 ppm CO2 concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants within the 850 ppm CO2 concentration yielded the largest average fresh and dry shoot weights and yields decreased as CO2 was further elevated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2212–2360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tip burn was more pervasive and earlier with larger CO2 concentrations.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
larger CO2 concentrationse0
Outcome
tip burne0
Direction
more pervasivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the physiological disorder tip burn was more pervasive and appeared sooner for either larger CO2 concentrations and larger DLIs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2365–2492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tip burn was more pervasive and earlier with larger DLIs.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
larger DLIse0
Outcome
tip burne0
Direction
more pervasivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the physiological disorder tip burn was more pervasive and appeared sooner for either larger CO2 concentrations and larger DLIs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2365–2492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tip burn occurred at 400 or 550 ppm CO2 at any DLI.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
400 and 550 ppm CO2 concentrationse0
Outcome
No tip burne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tip burn was observed at 400 and 550 ppm CO2 concentrations within any DLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2494–2571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light produced larger physical size dimensions.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
lower light intensitiese0
Outcome
physical size dimensionse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
higher light intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lettuce grown in lower light intensities had larger physical size dimensions, but were less dense and had less biomass, compared to lettuce grown in higher light intensities which had a smaller physical dimension, but were more dense and thus greater biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2576–2834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light produced less dense.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
lower light intensitiese0
Outcome
densee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
higher light intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lettuce grown in lower light intensities had larger physical size dimensions, but were less dense and had less biomass, compared to lettuce grown in higher light intensities which had a smaller physical dimension, but were more dense and thus greater biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2576–2834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light produced less biomass.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
lower light intensitiese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
higher light intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lettuce grown in lower light intensities had larger physical size dimensions, but were less dense and had less biomass, compared to lettuce grown in higher light intensities which had a smaller physical dimension, but were more dense and thus greater biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2576–2834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A production resource metric was 69 gfresh kWh-1.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
resource use efficienciese0
Value
69 gfresh kWh-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metrics for the average overall resource use efficiencies of plant production for fresh weight edible biomass were 69 gfresh kWh-1, 147 gfresh LCO2-1, 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1 , and 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2839–3044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A production resource metric was 147 gfresh LCO2-1.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
resource use efficienciese0
Value
147 gfresh LCO2-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metrics for the average overall resource use efficiencies of plant production for fresh weight edible biomass were 69 gfresh kWh-1, 147 gfresh LCO2-1, 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1 , and 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2839–3044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A production resource metric was 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
resource use efficienciese0
Value
20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metrics for the average overall resource use efficiencies of plant production for fresh weight edible biomass were 69 gfresh kWh-1, 147 gfresh LCO2-1, 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1 , and 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2839–3044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A production resource metric was 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
resource use efficienciese0
Value
86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metrics for the average overall resource use efficiencies of plant production for fresh weight edible biomass were 69 gfresh kWh-1, 147 gfresh LCO2-1, 20.7 LH2O kgfresh-1 y-1 , and 86.0 kgfresh m-2 y-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2839–3044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing DLI/CO2 from 17/400 to 13/850 could save $59 per harvest.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
13/850e0
Outcome
potential electrical savingse0
Direction
savingse0
Value
$59 per harveste0
Comparator
17/400e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potential electrical savings from changing the DLI (mol m-2 d-1)/CO2 (ppm) combination from 17/400 to 13/850 in the small scale research facility, to which this study was conducted, is $59 per harvest and $762 for the year (14.4% savings)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3049–3291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing DLI/CO2 from 17/400 to 13/850 could save $762 for the year.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
13/850e0
Outcome
potential electrical savingse0
Direction
savingse0
Value
$762 for the yeare0
Comparator
17/400e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potential electrical savings from changing the DLI (mol m-2 d-1)/CO2 (ppm) combination from 17/400 to 13/850 in the small scale research facility, to which this study was conducted, is $59 per harvest and $762 for the year (14.4% savings)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3049–3291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing DLI/CO2 from 17/400 to 13/850 could save 14.4% savings.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
13/850e0
Outcome
potential electrical savingse0
Direction
savingse0
Value
14.4% savingse0
Comparator
17/400e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potential electrical savings from changing the DLI (mol m-2 d-1)/CO2 (ppm) combination from 17/400 to 13/850 in the small scale research facility, to which this study was conducted, is $59 per harvest and $762 for the year (14.4% savings)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3049–3291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Larger vertical farms could gain greater electrical savings by lowering DLI and raising CO2.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
lowering the DLI and increasing CO2 concentrationse0
Outcome
electrical savings potentiale0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larger commercial vertical farm operations lowering the DLI and increasing CO2 concentrations could have a much greater electrical savings potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3293–3441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 243 positive, 57 negative or no effect

242 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.