Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of organic manures and phosphorus on cowpea and their residual effect on succeeding little millet

G. Umadevi; V. Sumathi; A. P. K. Reddy; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2017-18 to 2018-19 at Tirupati (AP) to evaluate the direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on yield of cowpea-little millet cropping sequence. Three levels of organic manures (no organic manure, FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1 and poultry manure @2 tonnes ha-1) and 3 phosphorus levels (0, 40 and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1) applied to cowpea and 3 graded levels of nitrogen viz., 0, 10 and 20 kg ha-1 applied to succeeding little millet. Yield attributes and yield of cowpea varied with manures and phosphorus levels. Poultry manure @ 2 tonnes ha-1 resulted in higher number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, pod and haulm yields which was on par with application of FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1. Among the phosphorus levels, application of 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted in higher pod yield. Yield attributes and yield of little millet were influenced by the residual effect of organic manures and phosphorus applied to cowpea, as well as nitrogen levels applied to little millet, where 20 kg N ha-1 resulted in significantly higher values of yield attributes and yield compared to 10 kg N ha-1 and control. This study concluded that the application of poultry manure to preceding cowpea showed residual effect by saving nitrogen dose to succeeding little millet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 2 t/ha gave higher pods per plant and seeds per pod in cowpea, on par with FYM at 5 t/ha.

Treatment
Poultry manure @ 2 tonnes ha-1e1
Outcome
number of pods per plant, seeds per pode1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1e1
Setting
Tirupati (AP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during 2017-18 to 2018-19 at Tirupati (AP) to evaluate the direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on yield of cowpea-little millet cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poultry manure @ 2 tonnes ha-1 resulted in higher number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, pod and haulm yields which was on par with application of FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 2 t/ha gave higher pod and haulm yields in cowpea, on par with FYM at 5 t/ha.

Treatment
Poultry manure @ 2 tonnes ha-1e1
Outcome
pod and haulm yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1e1
Setting
Tirupati (AP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during 2017-18 to 2018-19 at Tirupati (AP) to evaluate the direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on yield of cowpea-little millet cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poultry manure @ 2 tonnes ha-1 resulted in higher number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, pod and haulm yields which was on par with application of FYM @ 5 tonnes ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among phosphorus levels in cowpea, 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave higher pod yield.

Treatment
application of 60 kg P2O5 ha-1e2
Outcome
pod yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
phosphorus levelse2
Setting
Tirupati (AP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted during 2017-18 to 2018-19 at Tirupati (AP) to evaluate the direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on yield of cowpea-little millet cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the phosphorus levels, application of 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted in higher pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–829 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes and yield of cowpea varied with manures and phosphorus levels.

Treatment
manures and phosphorus levelse3
Outcome
Yield attributes and yielde3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Yield attributes and yield of cowpea varied with manures and phosphorus levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–569 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes and yield of little millet were influenced by the residual effect of organic manures and phosphorus applied to cowpea.

Taxon
little millete4
Treatment
residual effect of organic manures and phosphorus applied to cowpeae4
Outcome
Yield attributes and yielde4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e4

“Yield attributes and yield of little millet were influenced by the residual effect of organic manures and phosphorus applied to cowpea, as well as nitrogen levels applied to little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In little millet, 20 kg N ha-1 gave significantly higher yield attributes and yield than 10 kg N ha-1 and control.

Taxon
little millete4
Treatment
20 kg N ha-1e5
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
10 kg N ha-1 and controle5

Verbatim

e4

“Yield attributes and yield of little millet were influenced by the residual effect of organic manures and phosphorus applied to cowpea, as well as nitrogen levels applied to little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1018 · show in text ↑
e5

“where 20 kg N ha-1 resulted in significantly higher values of yield attributes and yield compared to 10 kg N ha-1 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1145 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure applied to preceding cowpea gave a residual effect that saves nitrogen dose for succeeding little millet.

Taxon
little millete6
Treatment
application of poultry manure to preceding cowpeae6
Outcome
residual effect by saving nitrogen dosee6

Verbatim

e6

“This study concluded that the application of poultry manure to preceding cowpea showed residual effect by saving nitrogen dose to succeeding little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1301 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.