Paper · 2020 · Der pharma chemica

Extraction, Phytochemicals Screening and Antibacterial activity of Carica papaya Leaf Extracts

Seema Kumari; Jaya Maitra

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carica papaya is a domestically produced plant and it is an accepted medicinal plant which is used traditionalistic and domesticated in India and tropical area of this world. The present study describes phytochemical constituent of Carica papaya leaves and its antibacterial screening. Fresh leaves sample were collected during the month of February, 2018 from Gautam Buddha University and Dadri (UP), India. The purpose of the study was the effect of different solvent and different method on the yield of the bioactive compounds of the papaya leaves growing in the semiarid region of Uttar Pradesh. Grinded leaves of papaya were extracted using different sovent i.e., n-hexane, PET, water, alcohol (ethanol, methanol), hydroalcohol (water+methanol) and the extraction was done by different technique soxhlet, as well as microwave assisted extraction technique. Many of these phytochemicals have amazing effects on long-term health when consumed by the human and can be efficaciously used to treat human diseases. The TLC analysis and phytochemical screening was carried out using standard methods and protocols. This study demonstrates that the microwave assisted extraction technique is better than soxhlet technique it also shows that hydro-alcoholic leaf extract of papaya gives better yield by microwave assisted extraction method and extracted leaves extract also shows the antibacterial activity against E. coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave assisted extraction performed better than soxhlet for papaya leaves.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Treatment
microwave assisted extraction techniquee0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
soxhlet techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the microwave assisted extraction technique is better than soxhlet technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydro-alcoholic papaya leaf extract gave better yield with microwave assisted extraction.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Material
leaf extracte0
Treatment
microwave assisted extraction methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“hydro-alcoholic leaf extract of papaya gives better yield by microwave assisted extraction method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracted papaya leaves showed antibacterial activity against E. coli.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Interactor
E. coliEscherichia colie0other
Outcome
antibacterial activity against E. colie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“extracted leaves extract also shows the antibacterial activity against E. coli and Bacillus subtilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracted papaya leaves showed antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0other
Outcome
antibacterial activity against E. coli and Bacillus subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“extracted leaves extract also shows the antibacterial activity against E. coli and Bacillus subtilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1441 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.