Paper · 2020

Soil Amendments to Re-establish Agricultural Production on Ex-tin Mined Area

Rizki Maftukhah; Ngadisih Ngadisih; Murtingrum Murtiningrum; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Mining is an important industrial sector in Bangka Island (Indonesia) where about 70% of this area is tin mining. The separation of tin via flotation of tin-containing soils results in acidic nutrient-poor soils with very low organic matter contents. Hence, ex-tin mined areas are highly and unsuitable for plant growth due to their un-fertility. To improve soil fertility soil amendments are of vital importance. This research aims to evaluate the impact of different soil amendments on agricultural production and basic soil parameters on the ex-tin mined area. The study was conducted on ex-tin mined area located in Bangka Regency, Indonesia (1o47’22.9085 S and 106o5’47.0461 E). Bangka Regency has a tropical climate with an average daily temperature of 27.2oC, precipitation during the growing season is 191.5 mm per month. The field trial was set up in July 2018 by a randomized complete block design with five different soil amendments and control plots for comparison, with a size of 2 x 2 m in four replicates. The treatments consist of the: (1) Control, (2) Lime, (3) Compost; (4) Charcoal and combinations of (5) Charcoal and Compost, and (6) Charcoal and sawdust. The soil was amended with t.ha-1 for the single amendments (treatments 2-4), and with rate 20 t.ha-1 for combined amendments (treatments 5 and 6). The plots are used to grow cassava (Manihot esculenta) for 12 months as the main crop and Centrocema pubescens as used as a cover crop grown twice for 6 months to avoid soil erosion. Soil samples were taken before and after harvest to analyze soil properties. Soil samples were analyzed for the following parameters: pH, Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC), and Electric Conductivity (EC). Crop yields were determined by weighing the total harvest of each crop per plot. The cover crop was harvested in December 2018, and replanted, until the main crop Cassava was harvested (30 July 2019), where the cover crop yield was also evaluated. Cassava yields were separated into belowground and aboveground yields. Soil amendments showed positive effects on soil pH, DOC, and EC at harvest time. Lime treatment significantly improved soil pH and EC (7.40 and 72.30 µS.cm-1 respectively), while DOC was significantly increased by compost treatment. Centrocema pubescens yields were significantly higher at the first harvest compared to the second one. The combined treatment with charcoal (10 t.ha-1) + Compost (t.ha-1) showed significantly the highest yield for both samplings. While another combined treatment, where, charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 each, showed the highest total cassava belowground biomass (5.44 ton.ha-1 ) as well as cassava aboveground biomass (3.06 ton.ha-1). Results of the present field experiment suggest that the application of soil amendments directly affected soil parameters. The effect on yields was positive but crop dependent, likely due to different nutrient requirements. Data on heavy metal uptake by plants regarding soil amendments will be presented. Soil amendments can provide the potential to improve food safety and security in the ex-tin mined area. Keywords: ex-tin mined, soil fertility, soil amendments, soil parameters, crop yields

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments positively affected soil pH, DOC and EC at harvest.

Treatment
Soil amendmentse0
Outcome
soil pH, DOC, and ECe0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil amendments showed positive effects on soil pH, DOC, and EC at harvest time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime significantly improved soil pH to 7.40.

Treatment
Limee0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
7.40e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lime treatment significantly improved soil pH and EC (7.40 and 72.30 µS.cm-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime significantly improved EC to 72.30 microSiemens per centimetre as reported.

Treatment
Limee0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
72.30 µS.cm-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lime treatment significantly improved soil pH and EC (7.40 and 72.30 µS.cm-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost significantly increased DOC.

Treatment
compost treatmente0
Outcome
DOCe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DOC was significantly increased by compost treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2337–2390 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Centrocema pubescens yields were significantly higher at the first harvest than the second.

Taxon
Centrocema pubescense0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first harveste0
Comparator
second onee0

Verbatim

e0

“Centrocema pubescens yields were significantly higher at the first harvest compared to the second one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2391–2493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal plus compost produced the significantly highest cover crop yield at both samplings.

Taxon
Centrocema pubescense1
Treatment
charcoal (10 t.ha-1) + Compost (t.ha-1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both samplingse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment with charcoal (10 t.ha-1) + Compost (t.ha-1) showed significantly the highest yield for both samplings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2494–2642 · show in text ↑
e1

“Centrocema pubescens yields were significantly higher at the first harvest compared to the second one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2391–2493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal and sawdust at 10 tonnes per hectare each produced the highest cassava belowground biomass, 5.44 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 eache0
Outcome
cassava belowground biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.44 ton.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 each, showed the highest total cassava belowground biomass (5.44 ton.ha-1 ) as well as cassava aboveground biomass (3.06 ton.ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2684–2894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal and sawdust at 10 tonnes per hectare each produced the highest cassava aboveground biomass, 3.06 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 eache0
Outcome
cassava aboveground biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.06 ton.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“charcoal and sawdust was applied at 10 t.ha-1 each, showed the highest total cassava belowground biomass (5.44 ton.ha-1 ) as well as cassava aboveground biomass (3.06 ton.ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2684–2894 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different nutrient requirements may explain crop-dependent positive yield responses.

Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
likely due to different nutrient requirementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect on yields was positive but crop dependent, likely due to different nutrient requirements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3024–3124 · show in text ↑
e1

“grow cassava (Manihot esculenta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments may improve food safety and security on ex-tin mined land.

Treatment
Soil amendmentse0
Outcome
improve food safety and securitye0
Setting
ex-tin mined areae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil amendments can provide the potential to improve food safety and security in the ex-tin mined area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3207–3310 · show in text ↑

charcoal · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.