Paper · 2020 · Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences

Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Growth and Yield of Red Onion (Allium cepa) in Drip Irrigation System

R. M Sujeewa; T Mikunthan; S Sayanthan; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving water use efficiency is a vital strategy for addressing future water scarcity. Irrigation is a wide-ranging practice using every drop of water for crop production through suitable practices. Since irrigation plays a key role in global water availability by impacting water productivity, a field experiment was conducted in DL 3 agro ecological region during the yala season of 2018 using drip and basin irrigation methods to evaluate the effect of deficit irrigation practices on growth, yield and water use efficiency of onion. Four treatments; water application through drip irrigation at 150%, 100% and 70% of crop water requirement and basin irrigation as control were designed. Water application at 100% of crop water requirement gave significantly higher onion yield as compared to 70% of crop water requirement and basin irrigation treatment. Also yield from 70% of water application and basin was not significantly different. The onion irrigated at 100% recorded 22.3% of increase in yield over basin method of irrigation. But, irrigation water use efficiency was found highest with drip irrigation at 70% of water application and lowest with basin irrigation. The amount of water saved at 150%, 100% and 70% under drip method was 13.8%, 31.12% and 50.8% respectively over basin method and this would be sufficient to irrigate additional area of onion crop earning better economic returns as compared to basin irrigation method. When consider the irrigation water use efficiency 70% of water application was the best irrigation practice compared to basin irrigation. Hence, the study suggests farmers in the dry region having limited amount of water for irrigation, should adopt drip method with combination of deficit irrigation rather than practice of basin irrigation methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 100% crop water requirement gave significantly higher onion yield than 70% crop water requirement.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
100% of crop water requiremente0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
70% of crop water requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water application at 100% of crop water requirement gave significantly higher onion yield as compared to 70% of crop water requirement and basin irrigation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 100% crop water requirement gave significantly higher onion yield than basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
100% of crop water requiremente0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
basin irrigation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water application at 100% of crop water requirement gave significantly higher onion yield as compared to 70% of crop water requirement and basin irrigation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield with 70% water application was not significantly different from basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
70% of water applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
basine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield from 70% of water application and basin was not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield at 100% water application increased 22.3% over basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
irrigated at 100%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22.3%e0
Comparator
basin method of irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The onion irrigated at 100% recorded 22.3% of increase in yield over basin method of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency was highest under drip irrigation at 70% water application.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 70% of water applicatione0
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
basin irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation water use efficiency was found highest with drip irrigation at 70% of water application and lowest with basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency was lowest under basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
basin irrigatione0
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation water use efficiency was found highest with drip irrigation at 70% of water application and lowest with basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 150% saved 13.8% water relative to basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
amount of water savede0
Direction
savede0
Value
13.8%e0
Comparator
basin methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of water saved at 150%, 100% and 70% under drip method was 13.8%, 31.12% and 50.8% respectively over basin method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 100% saved 31.12% water relative to basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
amount of water savede0
Direction
savede0
Value
31.12%e0
Comparator
basin methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of water saved at 150%, 100% and 70% under drip method was 13.8%, 31.12% and 50.8% respectively over basin method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 70% saved 50.8% water relative to basin irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Treatment
70%e0
Outcome
amount of water savede0
Direction
savede0
Value
50.8%e0
Comparator
basin methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of water saved at 150%, 100% and 70% under drip method was 13.8%, 31.12% and 50.8% respectively over basin method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1303 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged 70% water application the best irrigation practice for water use efficiency.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Outcome
70% of water application was the best irrigation practicee0
Comparator
basin irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“When consider the irrigation water use efficiency 70% of water application was the best irrigation practice compared to basin irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1584 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers in dry regions with limited irrigation water should adopt deficit drip irrigation.

Taxon
Red Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat0
Outcome
adopt drip method with combination of deficit irrigatione0
Comparator
basin irrigation methodse0
Setting
dry regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Red Onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“the study suggests farmers in the dry region having limited amount of water for irrigation, should adopt drip method with combination of deficit irrigation rather than practice of basin irrigation methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1797 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.