Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of weed management practices on yield attribution of urdbean under late sown

VK Tiwari; Rajveer Singh Yadav; Ramesh Mahajan; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2012 at the Research Cum Instructional Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyala, Raipur to find out appropriate sowing date and weed management practices of blackgram. The experiment was laid down in split plot design with three replication. There were three date of sowing assigned in main plot and the weed management practices assigned in sub plot The soil of the experimental field was clayey in texture (Vertisols) with low N, medium P and high K content. Result revealed that the highest plant population was recorded under August 9 sowing over rest of sowing dates. Significantly the higher yield and its attribute was noted under August 9 sowing over other dates tested. Among the weed management practices, application of imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6) produced significantly higher yield and its attribute. However, it was found at par with pendimethalin (PE) @ 1 kg ha-1 + HW at 25 DAS (W4). Among different weed management practices, application of imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6) performed better over other weed management practices under the agro-climatic condition of Chhattisgarh plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August 9 sowing had the highest plant population.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
August 9 sowinge0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
rest of sowing datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest plant population was recorded under August 9 sowing over rest of sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

August 9 sowing had significantly higher yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
August 9 sowinge0
Outcome
yield and its attributee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other dates testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly the higher yield and its attribute was noted under August 9 sowing over other dates tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox and hand weeding gave significantly higher yield and attributes.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6)e0
Outcome
yield and its attributee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
pendimethalin (PE) @ 1 kg ha-1 + HW at 25 DAS (W4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6) produced significantly higher yield and its attribute. However, it was found at par with pendimethalin (PE) @ 1 kg ha-1 + HW at 25 DAS (W4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–1010 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The imazethapyr plus imazamox program performed best under Chhattisgarh plains conditions.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6)e0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Setting
Chhattisgarh plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of imazethapyr 35 % + imazamox 35 % (Odyssey 70 WG) @ 75 g ha-1 + HW at 35 DAS (W6) performed better over other weed management practices under the agro-climatic condition of Chhattisgarh plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1261 · show in text ↑

imazamox · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.