Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Comparative efficacy of selected chemicals and biopesticides against gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Ramachandra Yarappa Lakshmikanth; Ashwani Kumar

14
claims
42
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present field studies were conducted during Kharif 2017 at Central agriculture field, SHUATS (Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences), Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh (India). All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control. The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments. When Cost benefit ratio was worked out, interesting result was achieved. Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45%SC reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.036%.

Treatment
Spinosad 45%SCe0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.036%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin 10%EC reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.053%.

Treatment
Cypermethrin 10%ECe0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.053%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novaluron 10%EC reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.074%.

Treatment
Novaluron 10%ECe0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.074%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos 20%EC reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.080%.

Treatment
Chlorpyrifos 20%ECe0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.080%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 5% reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.092%.

Treatment
Neem oil 5%e0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.092%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.105%.

Treatment
Beauveria bassianae0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.105%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE 5% reduced cowpea pod borer infestation; observed infestation was 1.130%.

Treatment
NSKE 5%e0
Interactor
gram pod borert1pest
Outcome
per cent of infestatione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.130%e0
Comparator
untreated plot of controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
t1

“gram pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum per cent of infestation was observed in Spinosad 45%SC (1.036%) followed by Cypermethrin 10%EC (1.053%), Novaluron 10%EC (1.074%), Chlorpyrifos 20%EC (1.080%), Neem oil 5% (1.092%), Beauveria bassiana (1.105%) and NSKE 5% (1.130%) are least among all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the eight treatments Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, Novaluron, Neem oil, NSKE and Beauveria bassiana including control reduced the infestation as compared to the untreated plot of control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 Spinosad had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.22 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T3 Spinosade0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:2.22e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 Cypermethrin had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.17 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T2 Cypermethrine0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:2.17e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 Novaluron had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.88 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T4 Novalurone0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:1.88e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 chlorpyrifos had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.74 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T1 chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:1.74e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 Neem oil had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.54 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T6 Neem oile0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:1.54e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 Beauveria bassiana had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.25 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T7 Beauveria bassianae0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:1.25e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 NSKE had a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.15 versus 1:0.81 for control.

Treatment
T5 NSKEe0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Value
1:1.15e0
Qualifier
1:0.81e0
Comparator
T8 Controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–181 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatment studied, the best and most economical treatment was T3 Spinosad (1:2.22) followed by T2 Cypermethrin (1:2.17), T4 Novaluron (1:1.88), T1 chlorpyrifos (1:1.74), T6 Neem oil (1:1.54), T7 Beauveria bassiana (1:1.25), T5 NSKE (1:1.15) as compared to T8 Control (1:0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1040 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorpyrifos · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cypermethrin · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

spinosad · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.