Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of plant growth regulators and chemicals on fruit retention, yield and quality of mango cv. Keshar

SM Palghadmal; S. S. Bhosale; V.H. Dale; et al.

7
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Present experiment entitled “Effect of plant growth regulators and chemicals on fruit retention, yield and quality of Mango cv. Keshar laid out in FRBD with seven treatments of plant growth regulators and three fruit stages with three replications., carried out at Research farm of Horticulture Section, College of Agriculture, Dhule (M.S.) during 2016-17. The different chemicals and plant growth regulators were used to study their effect on fruit growth, retention, quality and yield. The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study. The overall results indicated that foliar application of CPPU 10ppm was significantly found to be beneficial to the economically important characters viz. fruit retention, number of fruits, average fruit weight and yield-1 plant and the cost benefit ratio was 2.99.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10ppm gave the highest fruit retention in mango.

Material
Keshart0
Treatment
spraying with CPPU@10ppme0
Outcome
percentage of fruit retentione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10ppm gave the highest fruit polar and equatorial diameters.

Material
Keshart0
Treatment
CPPU@10ppme2
Outcome
polar diameter and equatorial diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–596 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10ppm gave the highest fruit weight.

Material
Keshart0
Treatment
CPPU@10ppme0
Outcome
weight of the fruite0
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10ppm gave the highest fruit number per tree.

Material
Keshart0
Treatment
CPPU@10ppme0
Outcome
number of fruit per treee0
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10ppm gave the highest yield per tree.

Material
Keshart0
Treatment
CPPU@10ppme0
Outcome
yield (kg/tree)e0
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CPPU at 10ppm was reported as significantly beneficial to economic fruit traits.

Treatment
foliar application of CPPU 10ppme0
Outcome
economically important characterse0
Direction
beneficiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of CPPU 10ppm was significantly found to be beneficial to the economically important characters viz. fruit retention, number of fruits, average fruit weight and yield-1 plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of CPPU 10ppm was significantly found to be beneficial to the economically important characters viz. fruit retention, number of fruits, average fruit weight and yield-1 plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported cost benefit ratio was 2.99.

Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Value
2.99e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cost benefit ratio was 2.99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cost benefit ratio was 2.99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
t1

“mango cv. Keshar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest percentage of fruit retention, highest size of fruit i.e. polar diameter and equatorial diameter, weight of the fruit, yield parameters namely number of fruit per tree and yield (kg/tree) was observed when spraying with CPPU@10ppm was done under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–751 · show in text ↑

forchlorfenuron · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.