Paper · 2015 · Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology

Evapotranspiration, Yield Components, and Some Quality Attributes of Subsurface Drip Irrigated Broccoli under Three Soil-water Depletion Levels

Tekin Öztekin; S. Öztekin; Naif Geboloğlu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment aimed to determine evapotranspiration, and responses of some yield and quality parameters of subsurface drip irrigated broccoli ( Brassica oleraceae L.). Treatments included water application when available soil moistures were depleted 30, 40, and 50% during both spring and autumn cultivations. Under a semi-arid climatic condition of Tokat, Turkey, the experiment was carried out with a randomized complete block design in clay and clay loam soils during, respectively, 2011 and 2012. The mean measured soil-water depletion levels of 39, 49, and 59% (irrigation treatments) yielded statistically significant results among the seasonal actual evapotranspirations with a range from 210 to 294 mm. The determined crop coefficients (Kc) during the initial growth stage of broccoli for the autumn cultivations did not follow those of standard recommendations. Furthermore, we could not find any statistically significant difference in the yield and quality components among the irrigation treatments, but among the cultivation seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal actual evapotranspiration differed significantly among irrigation treatments, ranging from 210 to 294 mm.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
seasonal actual evapotranspirationse0
Value
210 to 294 mme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean measured soil-water depletion levels of 39, 49, and 59% (irrigation treatments) yielded statistically significant results among the seasonal actual evapotranspirations with a range from 210 to 294 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn initial growth stage crop coefficients differed from standard recommendations.

Organ / stage
initial growth stagee0
Outcome
crop coefficients (Kc)e0
Direction
did not followe0
Qualifier
autumn cultivationse0
Comparator
standard recommendationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The determined crop coefficients (Kc) during the initial growth stage of broccoli for the autumn cultivations did not follow those of standard recommendations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
could not find any statistically significant differencee0
Comparator
irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we could not find any statistically significant difference in the yield and quality components among the irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality components did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
quality componentse0
Direction
could not find any statistically significant differencee0
Comparator
irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we could not find any statistically significant difference in the yield and quality components among the irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and quality components differed among cultivation seasons.

Outcome
yield and quality componentse1
Comparator
cultivation seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but among the cultivation seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield and quality components among the irrigation treatments, but among the cultivation seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1047 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.