Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Study of yield and economics of two different varieties of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) at different NPK level under guava based agri-horti system in Vindhyan region

Sonu Kumar; Avijit Sen; Sant Prasad; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2017 at the Agricultural Research Farm, Banaras Hindu University-South Campus, Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design in guava based agri-horti system treatment which was replicated thrice. Inoculation of Rhizobium along with application of N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1), recorded significantly higher grain and straw yield of green gram than the control. Two varieties were selected HUM-16 & SAMRAT .The highest net return of Rs 93901.03 ha-1 was recorded under inoculation of Rhizobium along with N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1) with HUM-16 variety while minimum return Rs 75781.30 ha-1 was found in control. Higher benefit cost ratio 3.01was observed with N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1) + Rhizobium with HUM-16. Application of N 40 kg ha-1 + P2O5 50 kg ha-1 and K2O 40 kg ha-1 brought about 668.16 kg ha-1 of grain yield of variety hum-16 with 3.01 ratio of B:C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus NPK increased green gram grain and straw yield versus control.

Treatment
Inoculation of Rhizobium along with application of N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Rhizobium along with application of N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1), recorded significantly higher grain and straw yield of green gram than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HUM-16 under Rhizobium plus NPK had highest net return of Rs 93901.03 ha-1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
HUM-16e0
Treatment
inoculation of Rhizobium along with N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 93901.03 ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest net return of Rs 93901.03 ha-1 was recorded under inoculation of Rhizobium along with N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1) with HUM-16 variety while minimum return Rs 75781.30 ha-1 was found in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control produced minimum net return of Rs 75781.30 ha-1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
returne0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rs 75781.30 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“minimum return Rs 75781.30 ha-1 was found in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HUM-16 with Rhizobium and NPK had a higher benefit cost ratio of 3.01.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
HUM-16e0
Treatment
N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1) + Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
3.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher benefit cost ratio 3.01was observed with N (40 kg ha-1) + P2O5 (50 kg ha-1) + K2O (40 kg ha-1) + Rhizobium with HUM-16.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HUM-16 yielded 668.16 kg ha-1 grain under NPK.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
hum-16e0
Treatment
N 40 kg ha-1 + P2O5 50 kg ha-1 and K2O 40 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
668.16 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of N 40 kg ha-1 + P2O5 50 kg ha-1 and K2O 40 kg ha-1 brought about 668.16 kg ha-1 of grain yield of variety hum-16 with 3.01 ratio of B:C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1030 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.