Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Bioefficacy studies of new fungicide molecules (Proquinazid 20 EC) against powdery mildew of apple

TR Rather; ZA Bhat; Bilal Ahmad Pandit; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Powdery mildew disease is one of the most important diseases in apple caused by Podosphaera leucotricha (Ell. and Ev.). The present investigations were undertaken at Ambri Apple Research Center Shopian, SKUAST-Kashmir during 2015 and 2016 to assess the field evaluation of new fungicide molecule; Proquinazid 20EC, for the management of Powdery mildew disease in Ambri Apple. Field evaluation for two seasons revealed that three sprays of Proquinazid 20EC @ 0.025 completely controlled the disease and recorded 0.0 per cent disease incidence and disease intensity. The fungicide was also effective at 0.02% concentration and recorded 4.2 and 1.0 per cent disease incidence and intensity, respectively, which was lesser than the standard fungicide, Sulphr 80% WP @ 0.2% concentration. The highest yield (29.70t/ha.) was also observed in Proquinazid 20EC @0.025% followed by the same chemical at 0.02% concentration. The results also showed that Proquinazid 20EC even at higher doses (0.04 and 0.08%) did not manifest any Phytotoxicity symptoms and also exhibited an appreciable increase in fruit yield of Ambri apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three sprays of Proquinazid 20EC at 0.025 completely controlled powdery mildew, with zero incidence and intensity.

Treatment
three sprays of Proquinazid 20EC @ 0.025e0
Interactor
Podosphaera leucotrichaPodosphaera leucotrichae1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence and disease intensitye0
Direction
completely controllede0
Value
0.0 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera leucotricha
Podosphaera leucotricha · InteractorJonathan Billinger · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three sprays of Proquinazid 20EC @ 0.025 completely controlled the disease and recorded 0.0 per cent disease incidence and disease intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–563 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple caused by Podosphaera leucotricha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proquinazid at 0.02% gave 4.2% disease incidence, below the standard fungicide.

Treatment
0.02% concentratione0
Interactor
Podosphaera leucotrichaPodosphaera leucotrichae1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lessere0
Value
4.2e0
Comparator
Sulphr 80% WP @ 0.2% concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera leucotricha
Podosphaera leucotricha · InteractorJonathan Billinger · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide was also effective at 0.02% concentration and recorded 4.2 and 1.0 per cent disease incidence and intensity, respectively, which was lesser than the standard fungicide, Sulphr 80% WP @ 0.2% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple caused by Podosphaera leucotricha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proquinazid at 0.02% gave 1.0% disease intensity, below the standard fungicide.

Treatment
0.02% concentratione0
Interactor
Podosphaera leucotrichaPodosphaera leucotrichae1pathogen
Outcome
intensitye0
Direction
lessere0
Value
1.0 per cente0
Comparator
Sulphr 80% WP @ 0.2% concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera leucotricha
Podosphaera leucotricha · InteractorJonathan Billinger · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide was also effective at 0.02% concentration and recorded 4.2 and 1.0 per cent disease incidence and intensity, respectively, which was lesser than the standard fungicide, Sulphr 80% WP @ 0.2% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple caused by Podosphaera leucotricha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest apple yield was 29.70t/ha with Proquinazid at 0.025%.

Treatment
Proquinazid 20EC @0.025%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
29.70t/ha.e0
Comparator
0.02% concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (29.70t/ha.) was also observed in Proquinazid 20EC @0.025% followed by the same chemical at 0.02% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proquinazid at 0.04 and 0.08% produced no phytotoxicity symptoms in Ambri apple.

Taxon
Ambri applee1
Treatment
Proquinazid 20EC even at higher doses (0.04 and 0.08%)e0
Outcome
Phytotoxicity symptomse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Proquinazid 20EC even at higher doses (0.04 and 0.08%) did not manifest any Phytotoxicity symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1042 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ambri apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Proquinazid doses increased Ambri apple fruit yield.

Taxon
Ambri applee0
Treatment
Proquinazid 20EC even at higher doses (0.04 and 0.08%)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proquinazid 20EC even at higher doses (0.04 and 0.08%) did not manifest any Phytotoxicity symptoms and also exhibited an appreciable increase in fruit yield of Ambri apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1115 · show in text ↑

application · Podosphaera leucotricha · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.