Paper · 2015 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Effect of different rootstocks on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon

S.F. El-Sayed

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted in the experimental farm of Sakata Seed Company, located in Ismalia Governorate, Egypt in 2012 and 2013. Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum and Nakai] cultivar Aswan F1 was grafted onto 5 different rootstocks, namely, 6001, Squash 3, Kazako, Emphasis and Argentario. The ungrafted Aswan watermelon cultivar was used as the control. Plants were grown in sandy soil under open field conditions. The results showed that while survival rate was low (64%) in control, it ranged from 82.0% to 100% in grafted plants. Grafted plants showed more vigorous vegetative growth than the control plants. When the soil was heavily infected with soil borne diseases, in the first season, the control plants had 7.987 ton/fed yield, while all types of rootstocks produced 30–127 % higher yield than the control. When the soil was free from soil borne diseases, in the second season, the control plants had 16.178 ton/fed yield, while grafted plants produced 9–13 % higher yield than the control. In contrast, Kazako rootstock had 12% less yield than the control. This could be attributed to incomplete compatibility of Kazako rootstock. Length and diameter of fruit and rend of fruit were positively influenced by grafting in the first year, while TSS% was significantly reduced by grafting in the second season. The study showed the importance of using grafting in heavily infected with soil borne diseases and importance of choosing the rootstocks that positively influence plant growth as well as yield and quality of scion fruit for the commercial use of grafting in watermelon fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had 82.0% to 100% survival versus 64% for ungrafted controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
ranged from 82.0% to 100%e0
Value
82.0% to 100%e0
Qualifier
64%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while survival rate was low (64%) in control, it ranged from 82.0% to 100% in grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had more vigorous vegetative growth than controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafted plantse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
more vigorouse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted plants showed more vigorous vegetative growth than the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heavy soil-borne disease pressure, rootstocks increased yield 30–127% versus controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
all types of rootstockse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
30–127 %e0
Qualifier
soil was heavily infected with soil borne diseasese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the soil was heavily infected with soil borne diseases, in the first season, the control plants had 7.987 ton/fed yield, while all types of rootstocks produced 30–127 % higher yield than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With disease-free soil, grafted plants yielded 9–13% more than controls.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9–13 %e0
Qualifier
soil was free from soil borne diseasese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the soil was free from soil borne diseases, in the second season, the control plants had 16.178 ton/fed yield, while grafted plants produced 9–13 % higher yield than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kazako rootstock yielded 12% less than control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Kazako rootstocke0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kazako rootstock had 12% less yield than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed lower Kazako yield to incomplete compatibility.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Kazako rootstocke0
Outcome
yielde1
Qualifier
incomplete compatibilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This could be attributed to incomplete compatibility of Kazako rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Kazako rootstock had 12% less yield than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting positively influenced fruit length, diameter and rind in the first year.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
Length and diameter of fruit and rend of fruite0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Length and diameter of fruit and rend of fruit were positively influenced by grafting in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly reduced fruit TSS% in the second season.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
TSS%e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS% was significantly reduced by grafting in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend grafting watermelon where soil-borne disease pressure is heavy and choosing favorable rootstocks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
using grafting in heavily infected with soil borne diseases and importance of choosing the rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“importance of using grafting in heavily infected with soil borne diseases and importance of choosing the rootstocks that positively influence plant growth as well as yield and quality of scion fruit for the commercial use of grafting in watermelon fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1607 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Grafting increased watermelon fruit size.

    Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting · 2007 · compared with non-grafted control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · survival · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.