Abstract
The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons to evaluate the impact of the shading and various nutrition programs on mitigating heat stress, reducing the use of chemical minerals, improving the reproductive growth and yield of tomato plant. Split-plot within Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was conducted in this study. Shading factor was allocated in the main plots and the nutrition programs distributed randomly in the subplots. Results indicate that shading resulted in the decrease of daytime temperature by 5.7˚C as an average for both seasons; thus a significant increasing was found in leaf contents of macro nutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Potassium), and micro nutrients (Iron, Zinc and Boron), except the Iron content in 2018 growing season. Furthermore, shading improved significantly the reproductive growth and tomato yield. Among the plant nutrition programs, the integrated nutrient management (INM) including the application of organic substances, bio inoculum of AMF and 50% of the recommended dose of chemical fertilizers; lead to the enhancement of nutrients content, reproductive characteristics and plant yield. Generally, combination of both shading and INM showed positive effects on plants nutrient status and persisting balance on tomato flowering growth and fruits yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Shading decreased daytime temperature by 5.7˚C.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- daytime temperaturee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 5.7˚Ce0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e0“shading resulted in the decrease of daytime temperature by 5.7˚C”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading significantly increased leaf macro nutrient contents (N, P, K).
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- leaf contents of macro nutrientse1
- Direction
- increasinge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e0“shading resulted in the decrease of daytime temperature by 5.7˚C”
e1“a significant increasing was found in leaf contents of macro nutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Potassium), and micro nutrients (Iron, Zinc and Boron), except the Iron content in 2018 growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading increased leaf micro nutrient contents (Iron, Zinc and Boron), except iron in 2018.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- micro nutrients (Iron, Zinc and Boron)e1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Qualifier
- except the Iron content in 2018 growing seasone1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e0“shading resulted in the decrease of daytime temperature by 5.7˚C”
e1“a significant increasing was found in leaf contents of macro nutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Potassium), and micro nutrients (Iron, Zinc and Boron), except the Iron content in 2018 growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading significantly improved reproductive growth and tomato yield.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- shadinge2
- Outcome
- reproductive growth and tomato yielde2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e2“shading improved significantly the reproductive growth and tomato yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management (organic substances, AMF inoculum and 50% of the recommended fertilizer dose) increased nutrient content, reproductive characteristics and plant yield.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- integrated nutrient management (INM) including the application of organic substances, bio inoculum of AMF and 50% of the recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse4
- Interactor
- AMFe4symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrients content, reproductive characteristics and plant yielde4
- Direction
- lead to the enhancemente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e4“the integrated nutrient management (INM) including the application of organic substances, bio inoculum of AMF and 50% of the recommended dose of chemical fertilizers; lead to the enhancement of nutrients content, reproductive characteristics and plant yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined shading and INM showed positive effects on plant nutrient status, tomato flowering growth and fruit yield.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combination of both shading and INMe5
- Outcome
- plants nutrient statuse5
- Direction
- positive effectse5
- Qualifier
- tomato flowering growth and fruits yielde5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“YIELD OF TOMATO”
e5“combination of both shading and INM showed positive effects on plants nutrient status and persisting balance on tomato flowering growth and fruits yield”
The same questions in other papers
shade · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →shade · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →shade · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
197 papers more in this group
See all 201 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
267 papers more in this group
See all 271 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.