Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of different sources of sulphur on yield and nutrient uptake by wheat

Anurag Sangwan; B. S. Duhan; PS Sangwan

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted at Choudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University to study the effect of different sources of sulphur on yield and nutrient uptake by wheat. The data revealed that grain yield of wheat increased significantly with increasing level of sulphur over control (7.68 g/pot). The magnitude of increase in grain yield was 13.1, 17.0 and, 20.4 per cent at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur application. The yield of wheat as affected by various sources and level of sulphur revealed that grain yield increased significantly with increasing level of sulphur over control. Amongst various sources of sulphur, the grain yield didn’t vary significantly. The nitrogen in grain and straw indicate that differences in concentration of nitrogen in both grain and straw were differed significantly. The concentration of nitrogen was found higher (1.33%) at highest dose (60 mg/kg) as compared to lower dose. The concentration of nitrogen was found higher at highest dose of S as compared to its lower dose however, the magnitude of increase in nitrogen concentration was more in case of straw as compared to grain. There was no significant difference in concentration of phosphorus in wheat grain due to various sources and levels of sulphur application however in case of wheat straw the phosphorus content differed significantly with increasing level of sulphur application over control (0.49%). The uptake of phosphorus in both grain and straw differed significantly with the application of sulphur over control. The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur. The content of potassium in wheat grain decreased significantly at 60 mg/kg sulphur application whereas; at lower levels the decrease in potassium concentration was found to be non-significant. The uptake of potassium and S in grain increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased 13.1 per cent at 20 mg/kg sulphur relative to control.

Treatment
20e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
13.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of increase in grain yield was 13.1, 17.0 and, 20.4 per cent at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased 17.0 per cent at 40 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
40e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of increase in grain yield was 13.1, 17.0 and, 20.4 per cent at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased 20.4 per cent at 60 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
60 mg/kg sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.4 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of increase in grain yield was 13.1, 17.0 and, 20.4 per cent at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ significantly among sulphur sources.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
didn’t varye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amongst various sources of sulphur, the grain yield didn’t vary significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain nitrogen concentration was higher at 60 mg/kg than at a lower dose.

Treatment
60 mg/kge0
Outcome
concentration of nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.33%e0
Comparator
lower dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of nitrogen was found higher (1.33%) at highest dose (60 mg/kg) as compared to lower dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen concentration rose more in straw than in grain at the highest sulphur dose.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
highest dose of Se1
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the magnitude of increase in nitrogen concentration was more in case of straw as compared to grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of nitrogen was found higher at highest dose of S as compared to its lower dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain phosphorus concentration did not differ significantly by sulphur source or level.

Treatment
various sources and levels of sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of phosphorus in wheat graine0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in concentration of phosphorus in wheat grain due to various sources and levels of sulphur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw phosphorus content differed significantly as sulphur level increased relative to control.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
increasing level of sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
phosphorus contente0
Qualifier
0.49%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of wheat straw the phosphorus content differed significantly with increasing level of sulphur application over control (0.49%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake in wheat grain and straw differed significantly under sulphur application versus control.

Treatment
application of sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of phosphorus in both grain and strawe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of phosphorus in both grain and straw differed significantly with the application of sulphur over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat potassium content decreased by 2.0 at 20 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
20e0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat potassium content decreased by 6.1 at 40 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
40e0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
6.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat potassium content decreased by 8.2 at 60 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
60 mg/kg sulphure0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
8.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain potassium content decreased significantly at 60 mg/kg sulphur.

Treatment
60 mg/kg sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
content of potassium in wheat graine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of potassium in wheat grain decreased significantly at 60 mg/kg sulphur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower sulphur doses the decrease in grain potassium concentration was nonsignificant.

Treatment
lower levelse0
Outcome
potassium concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at lower levels the decrease in potassium concentration was found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1823 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain uptake of potassium increased significantly with sulphur level.

Treatment
increasing levels of sulphure0
Outcome
uptake of potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of potassium and S in grain increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain uptake of S increased significantly with sulphur level.

Treatment
increasing levels of sulphure0
Outcome
S in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of potassium and S in grain increased significantly with increasing levels of sulphur over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.