Abstract
Monitoring of plant lodging and yield response was performed with the aim to quantify the maize plant response to WCR larvae root damage. Results of plant lodging ranged from 5.39% to 22.26%. Ploughing down of harvest residues slightly decreased percentage of the plant lodging from 12.92% to 15.24% comparing to the removal of harvest residues. Yield response to CR was followed by 565 kg ha-1 prior to and 586 k /ha-1 after the WCR appearance. Yield differences were 2.861 t ha-1 and 2.840 t ha-1, percentage of yield losses was 35.6% and 33.0% in CRO and CR1, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Maize plant lodging ranged from 5.39% to 22.26% in the monitored plots under larval root damage.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgifera
Diabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest - Outcome
- plant lodginge0
- Value
- 5.39% to 22.26%e0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e0“Results of plant lodging ranged from 5.39% to 22.26%”
Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing down harvest residues slightly decreased the percentage of maize plant lodging, from 12.92% to 15.24%, compared with removing the residues.
- Treatment
- Ploughing down of harvest residuese1
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- percentage of the plant lodginge1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- from 12.92% to 15.24%e1
- Qualifier
- slightlye1
- Comparator
- removal of harvest residuese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e1“Ploughing down of harvest residues slightly decreased percentage of the plant lodging from 12.92% to 15.24% comparing to the removal of harvest residues”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences in CRO were 2.861 t/ha in maize affected by Diabrotica larval root damage.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- Yield differencese2
- Value
- 2.861 t ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- CROe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e2“Yield differences were 2.861 t ha-1 and 2.840 t ha-1, percentage of yield losses was 35.6% and 33.0% in CRO and CR1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences in CR1 were 2.840 t/ha in maize affected by Diabrotica larval root damage.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- Yield differencese2
- Value
- 2.840 t ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- CR1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e2“Yield differences were 2.861 t ha-1 and 2.840 t ha-1, percentage of yield losses was 35.6% and 33.0% in CRO and CR1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Percentage of yield losses in maize was 35.6% in CRO.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- percentage of yield lossese2
- Value
- 35.6%e2
- Qualifier
- CROe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e2“Yield differences were 2.861 t ha-1 and 2.840 t ha-1, percentage of yield losses was 35.6% and 33.0% in CRO and CR1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Percentage of yield losses in maize was 33.0% in CR1.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- percentage of yield lossese2
- Value
- 33.0%e2
- Qualifier
- CR1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e2“Yield differences were 2.861 t ha-1 and 2.840 t ha-1, percentage of yield losses was 35.6% and 33.0% in CRO and CR1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield in the response to CR was 565 kg/ha prior to WCR appearance.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- Yield responsee3
- Value
- 565 kg ha-1e3
- Qualifier
- prior toe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e3“Yield response to CR was followed by 565 kg ha-1 prior to and 586 k /ha-1 after the WCR appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield in the response to CR was 586 kg/ha after WCR appearance.
- Interactor
- Diabrotica virgifera virgiferaDiabrotica virgifera virgiferat0pest
- Outcome
- Yield responsee3
- Value
- 586 k /ha-1e3
- Qualifier
- after the WCR appearancee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize plants caused by larvae of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte”
e3“Yield response to CR was followed by 565 kg ha-1 prior to and 586 k /ha-1 after the WCR appearance”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · Diabrotica virgifera virgifera · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.