Paper · 2010 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

RESPONSE OF COWPEA TO WATER DEFICIT UNDER SEMI-PORTABLE SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM

M. A. Aboamera,

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system. The experiment was conducted under three levels of water application deficit which were: fully irrigation (with 100% of soil moisture content at field capacity), 80%, and 60% of soil moisture content at field capacity. For all levels of water deficit, the highest percentage of water application depth (31.02%), occurred during mid - season stage. The higher crop evapotranspiration (Etc) value was (6.94 mm. d-1) observed after 35 days from planting with fully irrigation. At 100% of soil moisture content at field capacity, the average value of crop coefficient (Kc) was 0.696, 0.615, 0.673 and 0.60 for initial, development, mid – season, and harvesting stage respectively. The average values of water stress coefficient (Ks) in development and harvesting stages illustrated that the crop extract from root zone without suffering water stress in the readily available water because of the root zone depletion was smaller than the radial available water in root zone. The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity. This lowest value of seed yield was associated with low number of pods/plant (14.6 pods /plant) and small increase in number of seeds per pod (11.00 seeds/pod) and average seed weight (20 g/plant). Increasing the deficit percent of water application resulted in progressively lower water use efficiency. At 80 % of field capacity, water use efficiency was 0.68 kg/m3 while, it decreased to 0.59 kg/m3 as the deficit percent increased from 80% to 60% of soil moisture content at field capacity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest percentage of water application depth occurred during the mid-season stage at all deficit levels.

Organ / stage
mid - season stagee1
Outcome
water application depthe1
Value
31.02%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“For all levels of water deficit, the highest percentage of water application depth (31.02%), occurred during mid - season stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–480 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop evapotranspiration was highest, 6.94 mm per day, after 35 days from planting under full irrigation.

Treatment
fully irrigatione2
Outcome
crop evapotranspiration (Etc) valuee2
Direction
highere2
Value
6.94 mm. d-1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“The higher crop evapotranspiration (Etc) value was (6.94 mm. d-1) observed after 35 days from planting with fully irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–606 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At full irrigation, average crop coefficients were 0.696, 0.615, 0.673 and 0.60 for the initial, development, mid-season and harvesting stages.

Organ / stage
initial, development, mid – season, and harvesting stagee3
Treatment
100% of soil moisture content at field capacitye3
Outcome
crop coefficient (Kc)e3
Value
0.696, 0.615, 0.673 and 0.60e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“At 100% of soil moisture content at field capacity, the average value of crop coefficient (Kc) was 0.696, 0.615, 0.673 and 0.60 for initial, development, mid – season, and harvesting stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–809 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average water stress coefficient in the development and harvesting stages indicated no water stress in the readily available water of the root zone.

Organ / stage
development and harvesting stagese4
Outcome
water stress coefficient (Ks)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“The average values of water stress coefficient (Ks) in development and harvesting stages illustrated that the crop extract from root zone without suffering water stress in the readily available water because of the root zone depletion was smaller than the radial available water in root zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation gave the highest seed yield, 1.12 Mg per feddan.

Treatment
fully irrigatione5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
1.12 Mg/feddane5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest seed yield, 0.67 Mg per feddan, occurred at 60% of field capacity.

Treatment
60% of field capacitye5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
loweste5
Value
0.67 Mg/feddane5
Comparator
fully irrigatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1244 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest seed yield was associated with a low number of pods per plant, 14.6 pods per plant.

Treatment
60% of field capacitye5
Outcome
number of pods/plante6
Direction
lowe6
Value
14.6 pods /plante6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1244 · show in text ↑
e6

“This lowest value of seed yield was associated with low number of pods/plant (14.6 pods /plant) and small increase in number of seeds per pod (11.00 seeds/pod) and average seed weight (20 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1442 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest seed yield was associated with a small increase in the number of seeds per pod, 11.00 seeds per pod.

Treatment
60% of field capacitye5
Outcome
number of seeds per pode6
Direction
small increasee6
Value
11.00 seeds/pode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1244 · show in text ↑
e6

“This lowest value of seed yield was associated with low number of pods/plant (14.6 pods /plant) and small increase in number of seeds per pod (11.00 seeds/pod) and average seed weight (20 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1442 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest seed yield was associated with an average seed weight of 20 g per plant.

Treatment
60% of field capacitye5
Outcome
average seed weighte6
Value
20 g/plante6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1244 · show in text ↑
e6

“This lowest value of seed yield was associated with low number of pods/plant (14.6 pods /plant) and small increase in number of seeds per pod (11.00 seeds/pod) and average seed weight (20 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the deficit of water application progressively lowered water use efficiency.

Treatment
Increasing the deficit percent of water applicatione7
Outcome
water use efficiencye7
Direction
progressively lowere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e7

“Increasing the deficit percent of water application resulted in progressively lower water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency decreased to 0.59 kg/m3 when the deficit increased from 80% to 60% of field capacity.

Treatment
deficit percente7
Outcome
water use efficiencye7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
0.59 kg/m3e7
Qualifier
0.68 kg/m3e7
Comparator
80 % of field capacitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
e7

“At 80 % of field capacity, water use efficiency was 0.68 kg/m3 while, it decreased to 0.59 kg/m3 as the deficit percent increased from 80% to 60% of soil moisture content at field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1738 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.