Paper · 2020 · Applied Sciences

Screening of Bacterial Endophytes Able to Promote Plant Growth and Increase Salinity Tolerance

Elisa Gamalero; Nicoletta Favale; Elisa Bona; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacterial endophytes can colonize plant tissues without harming the plant. Instead, they are often able to increase plant growth and tolerance to environmental stresses. In this work, new strains of bacterial endophytes were isolated from three economically important crop plants (sorghum, cucumber and tomato) grown in three different regions in soils with different management. All bacterial strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and characterized for plant beneficial traits. Based on physiological activities, we selected eight strains that were further tested for their antibiotic resistance profile and for the ability to efficiently colonize the interior of sorghum plants. According to the results of the re-inoculation test, five strains were used to inoculate sorghum seeds. Then, plant growth promotion activity was assessed on sorghum plants exposed to salinity stress. Only two bacterial endophytes increased plant biomass, but three of them delayed or reduced plant salinity stress symptoms. These five strains were then characterized for the ability to produce the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which is involved in the increase of stress tolerance. Pseudomonas brassicacearum SVB6R1 was the only strain that was able to produce this enzyme, suggesting that ACC deaminase is not the only physiological trait involved in conferring plant tolerance to salt stress in these bacterial strains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two bacterial endophytes increased sorghum biomass.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
bacterial endophytese0
Interactor
bacterial endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
salinity stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only two bacterial endophytes increased plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum plants exposed to salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three endophytes delayed or reduced salinity stress symptoms.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
bacterial endophytese1
Interactor
bacterial endophytese1symbiont
Outcome
plant salinity stress symptomse0
Direction
delayed or reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three of them delayed or reduced plant salinity stress symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains of bacterial endophytes were isolated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–233 · show in text ↑
e2

“sorghum plants exposed to salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–889 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.