Paper · 2018 · Myronivka Bulletin

Yield formation of soybean under the influence of inoculation and top-dressing

H. L. Hadzovskyi; N. V. Novytska

10
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Purpose. To establish reaction of soybean varieties to seed inoculation by bacterial preparation and to foliar nutrition of plants by chelate microfertilizers. Methods. Field studies were carried out in 2017, 2018 in the zone of Western Polissia on sod podzol soils of stationary crop rotation of the ALLC Vasiuty (Kovel district, Volyn region) with the inoculant Legume Fix based on bacteria Bradyrhizobium japonicum 532c and the preparations of foliar nutrition Wuxal Оilseed and Quantum-Oil on the soybean varieties Canadian Kassidy and French Mentor. The planting practice was typical for the zone. Phenological observations and yield counts in different in weather conditions years of research were carried out according to conventional methods for soybeans, yielding capacity was determined by the method of full threshing plot with combine. The part of the factor influence on yield was determined by ANOVA at 5 % significance level. Results. In 2017, in dry unfavorable weather conditions of the year the average seed yield for the soybean variety Kassidy was 2.17 t/ha, for the Mentor it was 2.25 t/ha, whereas in favorable 2018 it was respectively 3.13 t/ha and 3.20 t/ha. Yield increase due to seed inoculation was 0.09–0.21 t/ha in the dry year (2017) and 0.15–0.35 t/ha in sufficient rainfed environments (2018). Yield increase due to foliar fertilization by chelate microfertilizers in the phase of budding was higher (0.15–0.36 t/ha) than the seed inoculation, and the efficiency of this practice did not depend on the year weather conditions. The maximum yield was formed in favorable 2018 by the variety Mentor when applying seed inoculation and crop treatment with Wuxal Oilseed (3.45 t/ha), and by the Kassidy variety when using seed inoculation and crop treatment with Quantum-Oil (3.37 t/ha). Conclusions. Seed treatment by the inoculant Legume Fix and foliar nutrition with chelate microfertilizers have significant effect on soybean yielding capacity in different year weather conditions. The interaction of these factors occurs to less extent than their individual effects. The efficiency of the foliar nutrition on yielding capacity in the unfavorable 2017 was 64 %, whereas in the favorable 2018 it was 50 %. The efficiency of seed treatment with inoculant was more in sufficient rainfed environments in 2018 (40 %) than in the arid 2017 (24 %). The part of influence of varietal characteristics on yielding capacity under favorable conditions decreased from 9 to 4 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kassidy yielded 2.17 t/ha in dry 2017 and 3.13 t/ha in 2018.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Kassidye0
Outcome
average seed yielde0
Value
2.17 t/hae0
Setting
2017e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, in dry unfavorable weather conditions of the year the average seed yield for the soybean variety Kassidy was 2.17 t/ha, for the Mentor it was 2.25 t/ha, whereas in favorable 2018 it was respectively 3.13 t/ha and 3.20 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mentor yielded 2.25 t/ha in dry 2017.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Mentore0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Value
2.25 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the Mentor it was 2.25 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2017, in dry unfavorable weather conditions of the year the average seed yield for the soybean variety Kassidy was 2.17 t/ha, for the Mentor it was 2.25 t/ha, whereas in favorable 2018 it was respectively 3.13 t/ha and 3.20 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation increased yield by 0.09–0.21 t/ha in dry 2017.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
seed inoculatione0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.09–0.21 t/hae0
Setting
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increase due to seed inoculation was 0.09–0.21 t/ha in the dry year (2017)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation increased yield by 0.15–0.35 t/ha in 2018.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
seed inoculatione1
Value
0.15–0.35 t/hae0
Setting
2018e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and 0.15–0.35 t/ha in sufficient rainfed environments (2018).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield increase due to seed inoculation was 0.09–0.21 t/ha in the dry year (2017)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar chelate fertilizer increased yield more than inoculation, by 0.15–0.36 t/ha.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
phase of buddinge0
Treatment
foliar fertilization by chelate microfertilizerse0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.15–0.36 t/hae0
Comparator
seed inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increase due to foliar fertilization by chelate microfertilizers in the phase of budding was higher (0.15–0.36 t/ha) than the seed inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mentor reached 3.45 t/ha with inoculation and Wuxal Oilseed in 2018.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Mentore0
Treatment
seed inoculation and crop treatment with Wuxal Oilseede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.45 t/hae0
Setting
2018e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield was formed in favorable 2018 by the variety Mentor when applying seed inoculation and crop treatment with Wuxal Oilseed (3.45 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kassidy reached 3.37 t/ha with inoculation and Quantum-Oil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kassidye0
Treatment
seed inoculation and crop treatment with Quantum-Oile0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
3.37 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by the Kassidy variety when using seed inoculation and crop treatment with Quantum-Oil (3.37 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2017, in dry unfavorable weather conditions of the year the average seed yield for the soybean variety Kassidy was 2.17 t/ha, for the Mentor it was 2.25 t/ha, whereas in favorable 2018 it was respectively 3.13 t/ha and 3.20 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrition efficiency was 64 % in 2017 and 50 % in 2018.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
efficiency of the foliar nutrition on yielding capacitye0
Value
64 %e0
Setting
2017e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of the foliar nutrition on yielding capacity in the unfavorable 2017 was 64 %, whereas in the favorable 2018 it was 50 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2098–2234 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculant efficiency was 40 % in 2018 versus 24 % in 2017.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
efficiency of seed treatment with inoculante0
Direction
moree0
Value
40 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of seed treatment with inoculant was more in sufficient rainfed environments in 2018 (40 %) than in the arid 2017 (24 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2371 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal influence on yield decreased from 9 to 4 % under favorable conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
varietal characteristicse0
Outcome
yielding capacitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9 to 4 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The part of influence of varietal characteristics on yielding capacity under favorable conditions decreased from 9 to 4 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2372–2494 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
t1

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

400 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.