Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Primary nutrient content and its uptake in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) as influenced by different nutrient management and seed priming

Rajesh Kumar; SS Sengar; Vivek Patel; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the experimental plots of DKS farm, IGKV, Bhatapara Dist- Baloda Bazaar, Chhattisgarh during kharif season of the year 2019. The soil of the experimental field was Alfisol and climate was sub-humid with a total rainfall of 872.2 mm during the crop growth. The objectives of experiment were to the study the effect of various nutrient management and seed priming treatments on N, P and K content and uptake of finger millet. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design. The treatments constituted with five nutrient management N1 (control), N2 (125 kg Neem cake + 1.25 tons ha-1 vermicompost), N3 (50“Kg/ha N : 50 Kg/ha P2O5 : 50 Kg /ha K2O”and 2% Borax spray at flowering), N4 (125 Kg Neem cake + 1.25 tons ha-1 vermicompost + 50 Kg/ha N : 50 Kg/ha P2O5 : 50 Kg /ha K2O and 2% Borax spray at flowering) and N5 (Recommended dose of fertilizer i.e. 20 Kg/ha N”: 20 Kg/ha P2O5 : 10 Kg /ha K2O) in main plots with four priming treatment P1 (control), P2 (Hydro priming for 6 hrs), P3 (Seed priming with 2% KH2PO4 for 6 hrs) and P4 (Seed priming with 20% liquid Pseudomonas fluorescens) in sub plots. Results revealed that the nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents in plant tissue were not affected significantly by nutrient management and seed priming treatments. However, the nutrient uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were found in higher range where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied. No significant effect of seed priming was seen for nutrient uptake of these elements by plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K contents in finger millet tissue were not significantly affected by nutrient management or seed priming.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
nutrient management and seed priming treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents in plant tissuee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents in plant tissue were not affected significantly by nutrient management and seed priming treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake was higher with higher chemical fertilizer doses or chemical fertilizer combined with organic manures.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manurese0
Outcome
nutrient uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassiume0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“nutrient uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were found in higher range where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming had no significant effect on uptake of these nutrients.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
nutrient uptake of these elements by plantse0
Direction
No significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant effect of seed priming was seen for nutrient uptake of these elements by plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1625 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.