Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Foliar Application of Plant Growth Regulators on Seasonal Variation in Physiological Behavior in Mango cv. Alphonso

K. V. Malshe; P. M. Haldankar; S. S. Patil

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during the cropping season of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Dapoli, Maharashtra on 35 years old uniform mango (cv. Alphonso) trees with an objective study the effect of plant growth regulators on suppression of post monsoon vegetative flush in mango. In the investigation the physiological behavior of the mango trees were assessed in relation to influence of plant growth regulator sprays. After 24 hours of treatment, the rate of photosynthesis was significantly varied due to foliar application of plant growth regulators. The rate was lowered down than control. Among the treatments, PBZ 2000 ppm treatment showed lowest rate of photosynthesis (6. 40 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) and on par with CCC 1500 ppm and 3500 ppm treatments. The control had highest rate of photosynthesis (6. 65 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1). After two weeks of treatment, the rate of photosynthesis was significantly influenced due to treatments of different CCC and PBZ concentration. It was reduced compared to previous readings. The significantly lowest rate (5.30 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was recorded in CCC 3500 ppm and highest (7.62 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control. The respiration rate after 24 hours of treatment, did not differed significantly during first year but differed significantly in second year and it was significantly highest (2.37 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) in PPP 2000 ppm treatment. The lowest rate (2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in PPP 500 ppm) and T7 (Control) treatments. The pooled data showed non significant effect of plant growth regulators on respiration rate at 24 hours after treatment. At two weeks after treatment, PBZ 2000 ppm treatment had highest respiration rate (2.53 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) and the lowest rate (2.21 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control. The treatments of CCC were on par among themselves. No significant differences were observed in leaf transpiration rate after 24 hours of treatment. Whereas, it was significantly differed at two weeks after treatment only in the first year. The significantly highest transpiration rate (4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was recorded in PBZ 2000 ppm treatment and lowest rate (4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was in control. The stomatal conductance did not differ significantly as reading taken after 24 hours of treatment. At two weeks after treatment, the rate was significantly differed and highest stomatal conductance (0.220 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was in control and lowest (0.156 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) in CCC 2500 ppm treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar growth regulators significantly lowered mango photosynthesis relative to control at 24 hours.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
foliar application of plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
lowered downe0
Qualifier
After 24 hours of treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 24 hours of treatment, the rate of photosynthesis was significantly varied due to foliar application of plant growth regulators. The rate was lowered down than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ 2000 ppm gave the lowest photosynthesis at 24 hours, 6. 40 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1, on par with CCC 1500 and 3500 ppm.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
PBZ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6. 40 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0
Qualifier
on pare0
Comparator
CCC 1500 ppm and 3500 ppm treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PBZ 2000 ppm treatment showed lowest rate of photosynthesis (6. 40 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) and on par with CCC 1500 ppm and 3500 ppm treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control photosynthesis was highest at 6. 65 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6. 65 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control had highest rate of photosynthesis (6. 65 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At two weeks CCC and PBZ significantly influenced photosynthesis, which was reduced from earlier readings.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
treatments of different CCC and PBZ concentratione0
Outcome
rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
After two weeks of treatmente0
Comparator
previous readingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After two weeks of treatment, the rate of photosynthesis was significantly influenced due to treatments of different CCC and PBZ concentration. It was reduced compared to previous readings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC 3500 ppm gave significantly lowest photosynthesis at two weeks, 5.30 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
CCC 3500 ppme0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.30 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly lowest rate (5.30 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was recorded in CCC 3500 ppm and highest (7.62 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest two-week photosynthesis of 7.62 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.62 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest (7.62 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 hours respiration differences were nonsignificant in year one but significant in year two.

Material
Alphonsot0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Qualifier
did not differed significantly during first year but differed significantly in second yeare0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The respiration rate after 24 hours of treatment, did not differed significantly during first year but differed significantly in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PPP 2000 ppm had significantly highest respiration of 2.37 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1 in year two.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
PPP 2000 ppme0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.37 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was significantly highest (2.37 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) in PPP 2000 ppm treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPP 500 ppm had lowest respiration of 2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
PPP 500 ppme0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest rate (2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in PPP 500 ppm) and T7 (Control) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control also had lowest respiration of 2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
T7 (Control)e0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest rate (2.18 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in PPP 500 ppm) and T7 (Control) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled growth regulator effects on respiration at 24 hours were nonsignificant.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Qualifier
at 24 hours after treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pooled data showed non significant effect of plant growth regulators on respiration rate at 24 hours after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ 2000 ppm gave highest two-week respiration of 2.53 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
PBZ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.53 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0
Qualifier
At two weeks after treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At two weeks after treatment, PBZ 2000 ppm treatment had highest respiration rate (2.53 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) and the lowest rate (2.21 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had lowest two-week respiration of 2.21 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.21 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest rate (2.21 μmol CO2 m-2 Sec-1) was in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC treatments were on par for respiration.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
treatments of CCCe0
Outcome
on pare0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
themselvese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments of CCC were on par among themselves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf transpiration differences at 24 hours were nonsignificant.

Material
Alphonsot0
Outcome
leaf transpiration ratee0
Qualifier
after 24 hours of treatmente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in leaf transpiration rate after 24 hours of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration differed significantly at two weeks only in year one, with PBZ 2000 ppm highest at 4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
PBZ 2000 ppme0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1e0
Qualifier
at two weeks after treatment only in the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas, it was significantly differed at two weeks after treatment only in the first year. The significantly highest transpiration rate (4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was recorded in PBZ 2000 ppm treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control transpiration was reported as lowest at the same 4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest rate (4.358 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance differences at 24 hours were nonsignificant.

Material
Alphonsot0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Qualifier
after 24 hours of treatmente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal conductance did not differ significantly as reading taken after 24 hours of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2228–2327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At two weeks conductance differed significantly, with control highest at 0.220 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.220 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1e0
Qualifier
At two weeks after treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At two weeks after treatment, the rate was significantly differed and highest stomatal conductance (0.220 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) was in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC 2500 ppm had lowest two-week conductance of 0.156 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1.

Material
Alphonsot0
Treatment
CCC 2500 ppme0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.156 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest (0.156 μmol H2O m-2 Sec-1) in CCC 2500 ppm treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2473–2532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cv. Alphonso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–125 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · physiology: photosynthesis · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.