Abstract
The influence of combined application of farm yard manure @ 5 tha-1 and or integrated use of different nitrogen levels with seed inoculation of bio-fertilizers was resulted positive effect, under the topic entitled “Influence of integrated nutrients on growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop [Cv.PBW-343] in Inseptisol” during cumulative study period of 2018-19 and 2019-20, at research farm, department of soil science and agricultural chemistry, Sam Higginbottom university of agriculture, technology and sciences, which is located at 25058’ N latitude and 810 52’ E longitude with an altitude of 98 meter above mean sea level and is situated 5km away on the right bank of Yamuna river, Prayagraj District of Uttar Pradesh. Among twelve treatments, during field experimentation, the conjunctive use of farm yard manure, seed inoculation with Azatobacter spp and Azospirillum spp and different nitrogen levels, together come with best results significantly. However, the growth factors including pre-harvest parameters (like plant height, number of green leaves plant-1, number of tillers plant-1, dry weight plant-1 which was observed at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after sowing, opined significantly highest in treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), which in turn ultimately gave the highest cumulative mean of economic productivity (62.79 q ha-1), straw yield (93.52 q ha-1), biological yield (156.22qha-1), percent harvest index (40.13%),in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1). Thus, integrated nutrient management pronounced its importance in the field of agriculture through supreme yield potential, diminishing the production cost and raising up soil health could be achieved.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 gave significantly highest wheat plant height, green leaves, tillers and dry weight.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobactor sppe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azospirillum spp
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- plant height, number of green leaves plant-1, number of tillers plant-1, dry weight plant-1e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after sowinge0
- Comparator
- chemical treatment (T3)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“plant height, number of green leaves plant-1, number of tillers plant-1, dry weight plant-1 which was observed at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after sowing, opined significantly highest in treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)”
e1“in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 produced the highest mean economic productivity of 62.79 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobactor sppe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azospirillum sppAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- economic productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 62.79 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- chemical treatment (T3)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), which in turn ultimately gave the highest cumulative mean of economic productivity (62.79 q ha-1)”
e1“in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 produced straw yield of 93.52 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 93.52 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- chemical treatment (T3)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), which in turn ultimately gave the highest cumulative mean of economic productivity (62.79 q ha-1), straw yield (93.52 q ha-1)”
e1“in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 produced biological yield of 156.22qha-1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 156.22qha-1e0
- Comparator
- chemical treatment (T3)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), which in turn ultimately gave the highest cumulative mean of economic productivity (62.79 q ha-1), straw yield (93.52 q ha-1), biological yield (156.22qha-1)”
e1“in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T9 produced harvest index of 40.13%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- percent harvest indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 40.13%e0
- Comparator
- chemical treatment (T3)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“treatment (T9) registering 75% nitrogen + farm yard manure @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobactor spp + Azospirillum spp (3kg ha-1) + Zn (ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), which in turn ultimately gave the highest cumulative mean of economic productivity (62.79 q ha-1), straw yield (93.52 q ha-1), biological yield (156.22qha-1), percent harvest index (40.13%)”
e1“in comparison with chemical treatment (T3) alone over control (T1)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →Azospirillum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
32 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.