Paper · 2020 · Journal of Biological Control

Biofumigation - An effective tool in enhancing yield of capsicum by suppressing soil-borne pathogens and augmenting biopesticide under protected cultivation in India

S.K. GHOSH; NATARAJ T; USHA NANDINI; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Biofumigation is a benign method to control soil-borne pathogens. The scope of the current research was to develop an effective formulation of Allyl Iso-Thio-Cyanate (AITC), commonly called volatile mustard oil and to evaluate its impact on suppression of soil-borne pathogens in capsicum cultivation grown under poly-house condition. After extensive research Multiplex biotech has developed a suspension concentrate formulation for biofumigation of soil based on an extraction of brassica enzyme called AITC and defatted mustard seed meal powder which could support both soil-sterilization and boosting soil fertility. A completely randomized trial was carried out on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition has shown that the application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigation under mulched condition was found to be an effective method to suppress the soil-borne fungal pathogens (70-80%) like Sclerotium rolfsii , Fusarium sp., bacterial pathogens (50-60%) like Ralstonia sp., Xanthomonus sp. and root knot nematodes (60-70%). In addition, it also complemented biocontrol activity of microbial antagonist like Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens , introduced as a treatment in the biofumigated plot after a gap of 6 days of Biofumigation. Improved plant growth (>18-20%), increased number of leaves/plants, early flowering and better yield (>22-33%) was recorded in the treatment where both T. viride and P. fluorescens were introduced as post fumigation treatment. This was followed by only biofumigated plot whereas in the non-fumigated plot disease incidences recorded was highest (43-45% more). Highest yield (46 tons/acre) was recorded in the plot where biopesticide was treated after Biofumigation followed by only biofumigated plot (37 tons/acre) and as compared to non-fumigated plot (28 tons/acre) which recorded the lowest yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofumigation suppressed soil-borne fungal pathogens by 70-80% in capsicum.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigatione1
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen
Outcome
soil-borne fungal pathogense1
Direction
suppresse1
Value
70-80%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigation under mulched condition was found to be an effective method to suppress the soil-borne fungal pathogens (70-80%) like Sclerotium rolfsii , Fusarium sp., bacterial pathogens (50-60%) like Ralstonia sp., Xanthomonus sp. and root knot nematodes (60-70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofumigation suppressed bacterial pathogens by 50-60% in capsicum.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigatione1
Interactor
Ralstonia sp.Ralstoniae1pathogen
Outcome
bacterial pathogense1
Direction
suppresse1
Value
50-60%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia
Ralstonia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigation under mulched condition was found to be an effective method to suppress the soil-borne fungal pathogens (70-80%) like Sclerotium rolfsii , Fusarium sp., bacterial pathogens (50-60%) like Ralstonia sp., Xanthomonus sp. and root knot nematodes (60-70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofumigation suppressed root knot nematodes by 60-70% in capsicum.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigatione1
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
root knot nematodese1
Direction
suppresse1
Value
60-70%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of this formulation as pre-planting treatment of soil @ 500ml/acre through drip irrigation under mulched condition was found to be an effective method to suppress the soil-borne fungal pathogens (70-80%) like Sclerotium rolfsii , Fusarium sp., bacterial pathogens (50-60%) like Ralstonia sp., Xanthomonus sp. and root knot nematodes (60-70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding T. viride and P. fluorescens after biofumigation improved capsicum plant growth by more than 18-20% over biofumigation alone.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
both T. viride and P. fluorescens were introduced as post fumigation treatmente2
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee2biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe2
Direction
Improvede2
Value
>18-20%e2
Comparator
only biofumigated plote3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e2

“Improved plant growth (>18-20%), increased number of leaves/plants, early flowering and better yield (>22-33%) was recorded in the treatment where both T. viride and P. fluorescens were introduced as post fumigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1562 · show in text ↑
e3

“This was followed by only biofumigated plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding T. viride and P. fluorescens after biofumigation gave a better capsicum yield (>22-33%) than biofumigation alone.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
both T. viride and P. fluorescens were introduced as post fumigation treatmente2
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee2biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
bettere2
Value
>22-33%e2
Comparator
only biofumigated plote3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e2

“Improved plant growth (>18-20%), increased number of leaves/plants, early flowering and better yield (>22-33%) was recorded in the treatment where both T. viride and P. fluorescens were introduced as post fumigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1562 · show in text ↑
e3

“This was followed by only biofumigated plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopesticide-after-biofumigation plot gave the highest capsicum yield (46 tons/acre).

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
biopesticide was treated after Biofumigatione4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
46 tons/acree4
Comparator
only biofumigated plote4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest yield (46 tons/acre) was recorded in the plot where biopesticide was treated after Biofumigation followed by only biofumigated plot (37 tons/acre) and as compared to non-fumigated plot (28 tons/acre) which recorded the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1936 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence was highest in the non-fumigated capsicum plot (43-45% more).

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Outcome
disease incidencese5
Direction
higheste5
Value
43-45% moree5
Qualifier
non-fumigated plote5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on capsicum ( Capsicum annum ) grown under polyhouse (one acre) condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–739 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the non-fumigated plot disease incidences recorded was highest (43-45% more)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1695 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Trichoderma viride · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

solarization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.