Paper · 2020 · Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)

Assessing growth and antioxidant properties of greenhouse-grown lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) under different irrigation and carbon fertilization management

Garmendia, Idoia; Bettoni, Marcelle M.; Goicoechea Preboste, Nieves

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that moderate water supply restrictions and enhanced CO2 concentration can maintain or improve yield and accumulation of secondary compounds in lettuce under greenhouse conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of reduced soil moisture content and carbon fertilization in shoot fresh weight (FW) and antioxidant capacity of two Batavia lettuce cultivars (Batabia Rubia Munguia; BRM and Maravilla de Verano; MV). Moderate water restriction treatment was equivalent to 2/3 of the field capacity and elevated CO2 concentration (ECO2) was fixed at ~700 µmol mol-1. While CO2 enrichment exerted a positive effect on shoot FW of MV, especially in combination with water restrictions, the yield of the cultivar BRM was not affected non due to CO2 concentration or irrigation regime. However, antioxidant capacity of BRM plants was increased under ECO2 conditions. These results demonstrate that carbon fertilization and/or moderate water limitations can be strategically used to enhance nutritional value and growth of greenhouse lettuce. Highlights Yield improvement and accumulation of antioxidants were evaluated in lettuce under greenhouse conditions. Enhanced CO2 concentration and water restrictions increased shoot fresh weight of Maravilla de Verano lettuce. Elevated CO2 conditions increased the antioxidant capacity of the cultivar Batavia Rubia Munguia. Moderate water limitations did not significantly diminish the growth of lettuce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased shoot fresh weight of MV, especially with water restriction.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
MVe0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
shoot FWe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
especially in combination with water restrictionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 enrichment exerted a positive effect on shoot FW of MV, especially in combination with water restrictions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRM yield was unaffected by CO2 concentration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
BRMe0
Treatment
CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of the cultivar BRM was not affected non due to CO2 concentration or irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRM yield was unaffected by irrigation regime.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
BRMe0
Treatment
irrigation regimee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of the cultivar BRM was not affected non due to CO2 concentration or irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased BRM antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
BRMe0
Treatment
ECO2 conditionse0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant capacity of BRM plants was increased under ECO2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water limitation did not significantly diminish lettuce growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Moderate water limitationse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not significantly diminishe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate water limitations did not significantly diminish the growth of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1502 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 33 positive, 9 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

irrigation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 32 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.