Paper · 2020 · Crop and Pasture Science

Zinc seed treatments improve productivity, quality and grain biofortification of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Aman Ullah; Muhammad Farooq; Faisal Nadeem; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a leading food legume primarily grown in marginal areas and consumed all over the world. However, its production is limited owing to zinc (Zn) deficiency in many chickpea-based cropping systems. This study was conducted over two years to evaluate the effect of Zn application through seed treatments on productivity and grain Zn biofortification of kabuli and desi chickpea types in Punjab, Pakistan. Pre-optimised doses of Zn were applied as (i) seed priming (0.001 m Zn) and (ii) seed coating (5 mg Zn kg–1 seed), using ZnSO4.7H2O (33% Zn). Hydropriming (soaking in water) and non-primed dry seeds were used as control treatments. Zinc seed treatments significantly improved leghemoglobin contents, nodulation, grain yield, grain Zn yield, grain bioavailable Zn, grain minerals and grain Zn concentration compared with control treatments in both chickpea types. During both years, kabuli chickpea receiving Zn seed coating had higher grain yield (2.22 and 2.73 t ha–1) and grain Zn yield (103 and 129 g ha–1) than kabuli receiving other treatments. Likewise, during both study years, maximum grain bioavailable Zn (4.58 and 4.55 mg Zn day–1) was recorded with Zn seed coating in both chickpea types. Kabuli chickpea had more grain bioavailable Zn than desi. With regard to seed treatments, desi chickpea was more responsive to Zn osmopriming, whereas kabuli was more responsive to Zn seed coating. In conclusion, Zn seed treatments, as seed priming and seed coating, are effective methods for improving the productivity, grain quality and Zn biofortification of both desi and kabuli chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed treatments significantly improved chickpea nodulation, grain yield, zinc yield, bioavailable zinc, minerals and zinc concentration.

Treatment
Zinc seed treatmentse0
Outcome
leghemoglobin contents, nodulation, grain yield, grain Zn yield, grain bioavailable Zn, grain minerals and grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc seed treatments significantly improved leghemoglobin contents, nodulation, grain yield, grain Zn yield, grain bioavailable Zn, grain minerals and grain Zn concentration compared with control treatments in both chickpea types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed coating gave kabuli chickpea grain yields of 2.22 and 2.73 t ha–1, higher than other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
kabulie0
Treatment
Zn seed coatinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.22 and 2.73 t ha–1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kabuli chickpea receiving Zn seed coating had higher grain yield (2.22 and 2.73 t ha–1) and grain Zn yield (103 and 129 g ha–1) than kabuli receiving other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed coating gave kabuli chickpea grain zinc yields of 103 and 129 g ha–1, higher than other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
kabulie0
Treatment
Zn seed coatinge0
Outcome
grain Zn yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
103 and 129 g ha–1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kabuli chickpea receiving Zn seed coating had higher grain yield (2.22 and 2.73 t ha–1) and grain Zn yield (103 and 129 g ha–1) than kabuli receiving other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc seed coating produced maximum bioavailable grain zinc of 4.58 and 4.55 mg Zn day–1 in both chickpea types.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Zn seed coatinge0
Outcome
grain bioavailable Zne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.58 and 4.55 mg Zn day–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain bioavailable Zn (4.58 and 4.55 mg Zn day–1) was recorded with Zn seed coating in both chickpea types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kabuli chickpea had more bioavailable grain zinc than desi.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Kabulie0
Outcome
grain bioavailable Zne0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
desie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kabuli chickpea had more grain bioavailable Zn than desi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desi chickpea responded more to zinc osmopriming, whereas kabuli responded more to zinc seed coating.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
more responsivee0
Direction
more responsivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“desi chickpea was more responsive to Zn osmopriming, whereas kabuli was more responsive to Zn seed coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1431 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

71 papers: 67 positive, 4 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

zinc atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

seed treatment · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.