Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Efficacy of chemical fungicides against spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) disease management of wheat in northern part of West Bengal

Rakesh Patsa; Suraj Goldar; Debanjana Debnath; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The spot blotch disease caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem is one of the most important foliage disease of wheat crop. This disease appears in almost all wheat growing areas of the world. In Northern part of west Bengal this disease causes severe yield loss every year. For the management of spot blotch disease of wheat five chemical fungicides was used. Plant disease intensity decreased with the application of different treatment over untreated control.The lowest AUDPC was recorded in T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l)260.8 followed by T5 (Tebuconazole@1ml/l) 293.21 and T3 (Carbendazim+Mancozeb @) 2.5g/l) 376.54. Maximum AUDPC was recorded (563.27) under T1 (Untreated/control). Due to the application of Propiconazole, spot blotch disease reduce up to 60.18% and increase chlorophyll contain of the plant, increase different morphological traits of wheat crop as well as also ultimately increase yield up to 35.02%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l) yielded AUDPC 260.8.

Treatment
T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l)e0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
260.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest AUDPC was recorded in T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l)260.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 (Tebuconazole@1ml/l) yielded AUDPC 293.21.

Treatment
T5 (Tebuconazole@1ml/l)e0
Outcome
AUDPCe1
Value
293.21e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5 (Tebuconazole@1ml/l) 293.21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest AUDPC was recorded in T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l)260.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 (Carbendazim+Mancozeb @) 2.5g/l) yielded AUDPC 376.54.

Treatment
T3 (Carbendazim+Mancozeb @) 2.5g/l)e0
Outcome
AUDPCe1
Value
376.54e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 (Carbendazim+Mancozeb @) 2.5g/l) 376.54”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest AUDPC was recorded in T4 (Propiconazole@ 1ml/l)260.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated control had maximum AUDPC of 563.27.

Treatment
T1 (Untreated/control)e0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
563.27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum AUDPC was recorded (563.27) under T1 (Untreated/control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole reduced spot blotch disease by up to 60.18%.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
spot blotch diseasee0
Direction
reducee0
Value
60.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the application of Propiconazole, spot blotch disease reduce up to 60.18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole increased plant chlorophyll content.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
chlorophyll containe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Propiconazole, spot blotch disease reduce up to 60.18% and increase chlorophyll contain of the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole increased morphological traits of wheat.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
different morphological traitse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Propiconazole, spot blotch disease reduce up to 60.18% and increase chlorophyll contain of the plant, increase different morphological traits of wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole increased wheat yield by up to 35.02%.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Propiconazole, spot blotch disease reduce up to 60.18% and increase chlorophyll contain of the plant, increase different morphological traits of wheat crop as well as also ultimately increase yield up to 35.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–925 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    T5 had the minimum AUDPC of 237.2.

    Management of Spot Blotch Disease of Wheat in Eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2018 · compared with Untreated/control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

propiconazole · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.