Paper · 2020 · Agricultural Research Journal

Effect of different holding solutions on post-harvest keeping quality of chrysanthemum cut stems

Nidhi Sharma; Madhu Bala

4
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The investigations were carried out at Ludhiana, Punjab during the year 2018–19 to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of floral preservatives as holding solutions and to standardize the optimum concentration to increase the post-harvest keeping quality of chrysanthemum cut stems cv. “White Star”. The chrysanthemum cut stems were placed in different holding solutions containing sucrose (2%), aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) and benzyl adenine (25 and 50 ppm) along with distilled water (control). The experiment was laid out using completely randomized block design with three replications under seven treatments. The holding solution containing sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm) was recorded to be the best treatment with respect to the maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days), complete floret senescence (29.98 days) and improved water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) as well as the maximum vase life (27.22 days) of the chrysanthemum stems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined holding solution produced maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days) in chrysanthemum cut stems.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
“White Star”e1
Treatment
sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm)e0
Outcome
leaf yellowinge0
Direction
maximum delaye0
Value
17.89 dayse0
Setting
Ludhiana, Punjabe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The holding solution containing sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm) was recorded to be the best treatment with respect to the maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days), complete floret senescence (29.98 days) and improved water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) as well as the maximum vase life (27.22 days) of the chrysanthemum stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum cut stems cv. “White Star””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ludhiana, Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cut stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined holding solution produced maximum delay in complete floret senescence (29.98 days) in chrysanthemum cut stems.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
“White Star”e1
Treatment
sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm)e0
Outcome
complete floret senescencee0
Direction
maximum delaye0
Value
29.98 dayse0
Setting
Ludhiana, Punjabe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The holding solution containing sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm) was recorded to be the best treatment with respect to the maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days), complete floret senescence (29.98 days) and improved water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) as well as the maximum vase life (27.22 days) of the chrysanthemum stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum cut stems cv. “White Star””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ludhiana, Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cut stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined holding solution produced improved in water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) in chrysanthemum cut stems.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
“White Star”e1
Treatment
sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm)e0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
138.67 ml/cut steme0
Setting
Ludhiana, Punjabe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The holding solution containing sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm) was recorded to be the best treatment with respect to the maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days), complete floret senescence (29.98 days) and improved water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) as well as the maximum vase life (27.22 days) of the chrysanthemum stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum cut stems cv. “White Star””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ludhiana, Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cut stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined holding solution produced maximum in vase life (27.22 days) in chrysanthemum cut stems.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
“White Star”e1
Treatment
sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm)e0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.22 dayse0
Setting
Ludhiana, Punjabe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The holding solution containing sucrose (2%) + aluminium sulphate (300 ppm) + benzyl adenine (25 ppm) was recorded to be the best treatment with respect to the maximum delay in leaf yellowing (17.89 days), complete floret senescence (29.98 days) and improved water uptake (138.67 ml/cut stem) as well as the maximum vase life (27.22 days) of the chrysanthemum stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“chrysanthemum cut stems cv. “White Star””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ludhiana, Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cut stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

aluminium atom · disease · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · physiology: water · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · physiology: water · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

N-benzyladenine · physiology: water · ChrysanthemumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sucrose · physiology: water · ChrysanthemumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.