Paper · 2020 · Theoretical & applied problems of agro-industry

Real-Time PCR primer design for rapid and specific identification of the emerging pest Drosophila simulans (Insecta)

Yousef Naserzadeh; Niloufar Mahmoudi; Elena Pakina; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arientinum Linn) belongs to Fabaceae family.In the Lower Volga region, it is also known as cossack pea or turkish pea.Chickpea has high fodder, nutritional and medicinal value.Moreover, chickpea is used as green manure.This crop improves soil fertility, contributes to obtaining cost effective and environmentally friendly product, and reduces cost of mineral fertilizers.[5,6] The article discusses the effect of bacterial agents on growth and development of chickpea plants, formation of bacterial nodules (Rhyzobium) and their effect on nitrogen fixation and yield of chickpea grown on light chestnut soils of Kalmykia under drip irrigation.Field experiments were carried out on zonal subtypes of light chestnut soils at Agronomus Center of Kalmyk State University named after B. B. Gorodovikov in 2016 2018.The purpose of the research was to determine effect of bacterial agents (Nitragin, Rizotorfin) and mineral fertilizers (N60P40) on chickpea yield in Kalmykia.The results of the experiments showed that seed inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (nitraginization), and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizers results in a significant yield increase and improves economic efficiency.Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%, Nitragin by 29.9%, and Rizotorfin by 35.0%, compared to the control.Combined application of mineral and bacterial fertilizers caused 62.6% yield increase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Fertilizerse0
Outcome
chickpea yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%, Nitragin by 29.9%, and Rizotorfin by 35.0%, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitragin increased chickpea yield by 29.9% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nitragine0
Outcome
chickpea yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%, Nitragin by 29.9%, and Rizotorfin by 35.0%, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rizotorfin increased chickpea yield by 35.0% versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Rizotorfine0
Outcome
chickpea yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%, Nitragin by 29.9%, and Rizotorfin by 35.0%, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mineral and bacterial fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 62.6%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Combined application of mineral and bacterial fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
62.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of mineral and bacterial fertilizers caused 62.6% yield increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizers improved economic efficiency.

Treatment
seed inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (nitraginization), and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizerse0
Outcome
economic efficiencye0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (nitraginization), and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizers results in a significant yield increase and improves economic efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizers increased chickpea yield by 29.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1258 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.