Paper · 2019 · Plant Disease Research

Management of leaf spot (Cercospora canescens) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) of cowpea through fungicides

D. K. Banyal; Ashima Thakur; Amar Singh

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In Himachal Pradesh, several diseases are responsible for causing serious losses to the forage cowpea crop. Leaf spot (Cercospora canescens) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) are important diseases of cowpea. For the management of these diseases, comparative efficacy of a new molecule of fungicide i.e. Nativo 75 WG (trifloxystrobin 25% +tebuconazole 50%) at different concentrations along with other recommended fungicides was evaluated during kharif 2014 and 2015. Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 percent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check. This treatment also proved better than other evaluated fungicides. Individually, tebuconazole 250 EC was found more effective as compared to trifloxystrobin 50WG against both diseases. sulphur 80% WG and mancozeb 75% WP were found less effective as compared to tested molecule (Nativo 75 WG (trifloxystrobin 25% +tebuconazole 50%) for the management of leaf spot and powdery mildew of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha controlled cowpea leaf spot by 77.1 percent over the check.

Treatment
Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/hae0
Interactor
Cercospora canescensCercospora canescenst0pathogen
Outcome
leaf spote0
Direction
controllinge0
Value
77.1e0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora canescens
Cercospora canescens · InteractorMeswaet Y, Mangelsdorff R, Yorou NS, Piepenbring M (2021) Unravelling unexplored diversity of cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae, Mycosphaerellales, Ascomyc · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 percent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaf spot (Cercospora canescens) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same Nativo regimen controlled cowpea powdery mildew by 67.2 percent over the check.

Treatment
Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/hae0
Interactor
Erysiphe polygoniErysiphe polygonit0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Direction
controllinge0
Value
67.2 percente0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erysiphe polygoni
Erysiphe polygoni · InteractorAlexoutside · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 percent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nativo increased cowpea grain yield by 20.2 per cent in the leaf spot comparison.

Treatment
Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.2e0
Qualifier
leaf spote0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 percent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nativo increased cowpea grain yield by 19.5 per cent in the powdery mildew comparison.

Treatment
Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19.5 per cente0
Qualifier
powdery mildewe0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays at 10 days interval of Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha were significantly effective in controlling both the diseases i.e. leaf spot and powdery mildew and gave 77.1 and 67.2 percent disease control with a maximum average increase in the grain yield i.e. 20.2 and 19.5 per cent, respectively over the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nativo performed better than other evaluated fungicides.

Treatment
Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/hae1
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other evaluated fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also proved better than other evaluated fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nativo 75 WG at 350 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole 250 EC was more effective than trifloxystrobin 50WG against both cowpea diseases.

Treatment
tebuconazole 250 ECe0
Outcome
both diseasese0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
trifloxystrobin 50WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole 250 EC was found more effective as compared to trifloxystrobin 50WG against both diseases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur 80% WG was less effective than Nativo for cowpea leaf spot and powdery mildew management.

Treatment
sulphur 80% WGe0
Outcome
management of leaf spot and powdery mildewe0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
Nativo 75 WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphur 80% WG and mancozeb 75% WP were found less effective as compared to tested molecule (Nativo 75 WG (trifloxystrobin 25% +tebuconazole 50%) for the management of leaf spot and powdery mildew of cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb 75% WP was less effective than Nativo for cowpea leaf spot and powdery mildew management.

Treatment
mancozeb 75% WPe0
Outcome
management of leaf spot and powdery mildewe0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
Nativo 75 WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphur 80% WG and mancozeb 75% WP were found less effective as compared to tested molecule (Nativo 75 WG (trifloxystrobin 25% +tebuconazole 50%) for the management of leaf spot and powdery mildew of cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1176 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.