Paper · 2020 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

The influence of differently coloured anti-hail nets and geomorphologic characteristics on microclimatic and light conditions in apple orchards

Marinka Brglez Sever; Stanislav Tojnko; Aleš Breznikar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Geomorphologic characteristics like altitude and terrain slope have an important but often neglected impact on light conditions in orchards. The study concentrated on the impact of altitude and terrain slope in combination with various colours of anti-hail nets (red, grey, blue, green and black) on the light and microclimate conditions in apple orchards. The results exhibit a large reduction of the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) under the nets, most prominently under blue and red nets (reduction between 38.7 and 45.6%), while the impact of coloured nets on other microclimatic parameters (average air temperature, relative air humidity, temperature of dew point, wet-bulb temperature, heat index, minimum air temperature, maximum air temperature) remain irrelevant. The only consistent difference is an average of 2% increase of maximum air temperature under the blue net in comparison to other treatments. The use of the net also significantly reduce the wind speed (on average by 56.3%) and air flow (on average by 63.4%), and changes the distribution of precipitation in the orchard, most prominently in cases of heavy rain and drizzle. Regarding the orchard’s geomorphologic characteristics, a positive relationship exists between altitude and PAR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anti-hail nets reduced orchard PAR, especially blue and red nets by 38.7 to 45.6%.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
blue and red netse0
Outcome
photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
between 38.7 and 45.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a large reduction of the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) under the nets, most prominently under blue and red nets (reduction between 38.7 and 45.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coloured nets had irrelevant effects on the listed microclimate parameters other than maximum air temperature.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
coloured netse0
Outcome
average air temperature, relative air humidity, temperature of dew pointe0
Direction
irrelevante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the impact of coloured nets on other microclimatic parameters (average air temperature, relative air humidity, temperature of dew point, wet-bulb temperature, heat index, minimum air temperature, maximum air temperature) remain irrelevant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue nets increased maximum air temperature by an average of 2% versus other treatments.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
blue nete0
Outcome
maximum air temperaturee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“an average of 2% increase of maximum air temperature under the blue net in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nets significantly reduced wind speed by an average of 56.3%.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
the nete0
Outcome
wind speede0
Direction
reducee0
Value
56.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the net also significantly reduce the wind speed (on average by 56.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nets significantly reduced air flow by an average of 63.4%.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
the nete0
Outcome
air flowe0
Direction
reducee0
Value
63.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the net also significantly reduce the wind speed (on average by 56.3%) and air flow (on average by 63.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nets changed orchard precipitation distribution, especially during heavy rain and drizzle.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Treatment
the nete0
Outcome
distribution of precipitatione0
Direction
changese0
Qualifier
heavy rain and drizzlee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the net also significantly reduce the wind speed (on average by 56.3%) and air flow (on average by 63.4%), and changes the distribution of precipitation in the orchard, most prominently in cases of heavy rain and drizzle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altitude was positively related to orchard PAR.

Taxon
apple orchardst0
Outcome
PARe0
Direction
positive relationshipe0
Setting
altitudee0

Verbatim

e0

“a positive relationship exists between altitude and PAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–143 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.