Abstract
Effect of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination on putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was studied in sorghum. It is evident that the average putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 48.40, 48.43 and 46% when exposed to higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5) as compared to lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS of interval. Similarly, when plants were exposed to higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11) than its putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 11.03, 13.22 and 13.18% as compared to T10. When treatment, T17 was compared to T16, the putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index increased significantly by 7.13, 6.73 and 5.35% at proposed DAS. So, the combination of putrescine and mycorrhiza showed the best combination for the mitigation of cadmium toxicity for the putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
T5 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T4 by 48.40% at 30 DAS.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 48.40e0
- Qualifier
- 30e0
- Comparator
- lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4)e0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 48.40, 48.43 and 46% when exposed to higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5) as compared to lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS of interval”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T4 by 48.43% at 60 DAS.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 48.43e0
- Qualifier
- 60e0
- Comparator
- lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 48.40, 48.43 and 46% when exposed to higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5) as compared to lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS of interval”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T4 by 46% at 90 DAS.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 46%e0
- Qualifier
- 90e0
- Comparator
- lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 48.40, 48.43 and 46% when exposed to higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T5) as compared to lower dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T4) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS of interval”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T10 by 11.03% at the first time point.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 11.03e0
- Comparator
- T10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11) than its putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 11.03, 13.22 and 13.18% as compared to T10”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T10 by 13.22% at the second time point.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 13.22e0
- Comparator
- T10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11) than its putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 11.03, 13.22 and 13.18% as compared to T10”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 nonsignificantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T10 by 13.18% at the third time point.
- Treatment
- higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11)e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 13.18%e0
- Comparator
- T10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher dose of polyamine (putrescine) and mycorrhiza combination (T11) than its putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index was non-significantly enhanced by 11.03, 13.22 and 13.18% as compared to T10”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T17 significantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T16 by 7.13% at the first proposed time point.
- Treatment
- T17e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.13e0
- Comparator
- T16e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When treatment, T17 was compared to T16, the putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index increased significantly by 7.13, 6.73 and 5.35% at proposed DAS”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T17 significantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T16 by 6.73% at the second proposed time point.
- Treatment
- T17e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.73e0
- Comparator
- T16e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When treatment, T17 was compared to T16, the putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index increased significantly by 7.13, 6.73 and 5.35% at proposed DAS”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T17 significantly increased sorghum responsiveness relative to T16 by 5.35% at the third proposed time point.
- Treatment
- T17e0
- Outcome
- putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness indexe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5.35%e0
- Comparator
- T16e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When treatment, T17 was compared to T16, the putrescine and mycorrhiza responsiveness index increased significantly by 7.13, 6.73 and 5.35% at proposed DAS”
t0“sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
putrescine · molecular: metabolites · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · SorghumResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.