Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

THE EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION APPLIED IN DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL PERIODS ON SAFFLOWER YIELD AND QUALITY

E. KARAŞ

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation applied in the different phenological periods of safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.) at the Central Anatolian region in Turkey between 2007 and 2009. A randomized split block design in fourteen subjects with three replications was used. According to the results, the highest yield was obtained from the issue when there was no water stress during the growing period. It was found that there was a decrease in yield from the subjects when periodic water deficit was applied at various rates. At the end of the research, the most effective periods for yield were determined as flowering, vegetation, and yield formation. The average seasonal water consumption was between 234 and 591 mm; the highest and the lowest grain yield was 5.10 t ha -1 and 2.48 t ha -1 , respectively. Irrigation water usage efficiency (IWUE) ranged between 7.3 kg ha -1 mm -1 and 11 kg ha -1 mm -1 . The amount of irrigation water applied had no effect on oil ratios ranging from 28.89% to 30.66%. The effect of irrigation water applied was observed only on stearic and linoleic fatty acids. The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) of water-yield relationships during the experiment was obtained as 0.44, 0.71, and 0.68, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest safflower yield occurred without growing period water stress.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
no water stress during the growing periode1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest yield was obtained from the issue when there was no water stress during the growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic water deficit decreased safflower yield.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
periodic water deficite1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a decrease in yield from the subjects when periodic water deficit was applied at various rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–568 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering, vegetation and yield formation were identified as the periods most affecting yield.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Organ / stage
flowering, vegetation, and yield formatione1
Outcome
most effective periods for yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most effective periods for yield were determined as flowering, vegetation, and yield formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal safflower water consumption ranged from 234 to 591 mm.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Outcome
seasonal water consumptione1
Value
234 and 591 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average seasonal water consumption was between 234 and 591 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was 5.10 t ha -1.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.10 t ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest and the lowest grain yield was 5.10 t ha -1 and 2.48 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest grain yield was 2.48 t ha -1.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.48 t ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest and the lowest grain yield was 5.10 t ha -1 and 2.48 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency ranged from 7.3 to 11 kg ha -1 mm -1.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Outcome
Irrigation water usage efficiencye1
Value
7.3 kg ha -1 mm -1 and 11 kg ha -1 mm -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation water usage efficiency (IWUE) ranged between 7.3 kg ha -1 mm -1 and 11 kg ha -1 mm -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water amount had no effect on oil ratios, which ranged from 28.89% to 30.66%.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
amount of irrigation water appliede1
Outcome
oil ratiose1
Direction
no effecte1
Value
28.89% to 30.66%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of irrigation water applied had no effect on oil ratios ranging from 28.89% to 30.66%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water amount affected stearic fatty acid.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
irrigation water appliede1
Outcome
stearice1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation water applied was observed only on stearic and linoleic fatty acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water amount affected linoleic fatty acid.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
irrigation water appliede1
Outcome
linoleic fatty acidse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of irrigation water applied was observed only on stearic and linoleic fatty acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reported water-yield relationship coefficients of determination were 0.44, 0.71 and 0.68.

Taxon
safflowersCarthamus tinctoriuse0
Treatment
water-yield relationshipse1
Outcome
coefficient of determinatione1
Value
0.44, 0.71, and 0.68e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“safflowers (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) of water-yield relationships during the experiment was obtained as 0.44, 0.71, and 0.68, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1286 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.