Paper · 2012 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

EFFECT OF CULTIVAR AND WATER REGIME ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

Amir Hassan Omidi; Hamid Khazaei; Philippe Monneveux; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Safflower seeds have a high content of oil of good nutritional value. In cereal-based rotations, it can help diversify cropping systems, break disease cycles and control grass weeds. Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran. The five water regimes consisted of a control (full irrigated) treatment and four treatments where irrigation was interrupted at bud formation, beginning of flowering, end of flowering, and seed filling. Measurements involved yield and yield components, biomass, plant height, seed oil content, phenological traits and agronomic and irrigation water use efficiency (WUEa and WUEi, respectively). No year effect was noted for most measured traits. Highly significant effects of the water regime were found on seed yield, oil yield, days to maturity and the number of capitula per plant. Seed yield and the number of capitula per plant were particularly affected by water shortage at bud formation (36.5 and 37.8%, respectively). The lowest agronomic WUEa was consequently when irrigation was stopped at beginning of flowering (28.9% less than in full irrigated) and at bud formation (18.3% less than in full irrigated). WUEi decreased with the quantity of water supplied by irrigation. Water regime did not affect seed oil content. Significant effects of cultivar were found for seed yield, number of capitula per plant, 1000-seed weight, plant height, seed oil content and phenological traits, except days to flowering. Padideh yielded 12.8% more than K.w.2 and 7.6% more than Goldasht. Seed yield was significantly associated with the number of capitula per plant but not with the number of seeds per capitulum and 1000-seed weight. These results demonstrate that bud formation is particularly sensitive to water deficit, and will allow better water management of safflower in semi-arid agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water shortage at bud formation reduced safflower seed yield

Treatment
water shortage at bud formatione2
Outcome
Seed yielde2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
36.5e2
Comparator
control (full irrigated) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“The five water regimes consisted of a control (full irrigated) treatment and four treatments where irrigation was interrupted at bud formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–471 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed yield and the number of capitula per plant were particularly affected by water shortage at bud formation (36.5 and 37.8%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water shortage at bud formation reduced the number of capitula per plant

Treatment
water shortage at bud formatione2
Outcome
number of capitula per plante2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
37.8e2
Comparator
control (full irrigated) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“The five water regimes consisted of a control (full irrigated) treatment and four treatments where irrigation was interrupted at bud formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–471 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed yield and the number of capitula per plant were particularly affected by water shortage at bud formation (36.5 and 37.8%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at beginning of flowering lowered agronomic WUEa by 28.9% relative to full irrigation

Treatment
irrigation was stopped at beginning of floweringe3
Outcome
agronomic WUEae3
Direction
lesse3
Value
28.9%e3
Comparator
full irrigatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest agronomic WUEa was consequently when irrigation was stopped at beginning of flowering (28.9% less than in full irrigated)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at bud formation lowered agronomic WUEa by 18.3% relative to full irrigation

Treatment
at bud formatione3
Outcome
agronomic WUEae3
Direction
lesse3
Value
18.3%e3
Comparator
full irrigatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest agronomic WUEa was consequently when irrigation was stopped at beginning of flowering (28.9% less than in full irrigated) and at bud formation (18.3% less than in full irrigated)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUEi decreased as the quantity of irrigation water increased

Treatment
quantity of water supplied by irrigatione4
Outcome
WUEie4
Direction
decreasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e4

“WUEi decreased with the quantity of water supplied by irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1312 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water regime did not affect safflower seed oil content

Treatment
Water regimee5
Outcome
seed oil contente5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water regime did not affect seed oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Padideh yielded 12.8% more than K.w.2

Material
Padidehe6
Treatment
Three winter safflower cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldede6
Direction
moree6
Value
12.8%e6
Comparator
K.w.2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e6

“Padideh yielded 12.8% more than K.w.2 and 7.6% more than Goldasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Padideh yielded 7.6% more than Goldasht

Material
Padidehe6
Treatment
Three winter safflower cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldede6
Direction
moree6
Value
7.6%e6
Comparator
Goldashte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e6

“Padideh yielded 12.8% more than K.w.2 and 7.6% more than Goldasht”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1614 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield is significantly associated with the number of capitula per plant

Treatment
number of capitula per plante7
Outcome
Seed yielde7
Direction
significantly associatede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e7

“Seed yield was significantly associated with the number of capitula per plant but not with the number of seeds per capitulum and 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1761 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield is not associated with the number of seeds per capitulum

Treatment
number of seeds per capitulume7
Outcome
Seed yielde7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e7

“Seed yield was significantly associated with the number of capitula per plant but not with the number of seeds per capitulum and 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1761 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud formation is particularly sensitive to water deficit in safflower

Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
bud formatione1
Direction
particularly sensitivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results demonstrate that bud formation is particularly sensitive to water deficit, and will allow better water management of safflower in semi-arid agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1928 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Better water management of safflower in semi-arid agriculture is enabled by the bud-formation sensitivity

Outcome
better water management of safflowere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results demonstrate that bud formation is particularly sensitive to water deficit, and will allow better water management of safflower in semi-arid agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1928 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year had no effect on most measured safflower traits

Treatment
yeare2
Outcome
most measured traitse2
Direction
No year effecte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three winter safflower cultivars (Goldasht, Padideh and K.w.2) were evaluated during two years under five different water regimes in Karaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–327 · show in text ↑
e2

“No year effect was noted for most measured traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–774 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.