Paper · 2020 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infestation and tolerance on stored cowpea seeds protected with Anchomanes difformis (Blume) Engl. extracts.

Jacobs Mobolade Adesina; Titilayo Elizabeth Mobolade-Adesina

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Purpose: The study was conducted to evaluate the infestation and tolerance of Callosobruchus maculatus to stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts. Research Method: Different concentrations of A. difformis extracts were admixed with 20g of uninfested cowpea seeds in 250ml plastic dishes. Ten unsexed adult C. maculatus were released into each treatment and toxicity was assessed at 24 hrs interval days after infestation, number of eggs laid on cowpea seeds was counted. At the end of the experiment, seeds were reweighed, number of emerged adult and damaged seeds were recorded. Findings: All extracts were significantly toxic to C. maculatus as concentration increased. Ethyl acetate (EA) extract exerted highest mortality ranged 90-100%, while methanol recorded highest longevity. Maximum reduction in egg laid was observed with EA extract (51.44-74.45%), followed by methanol extract at 100 (58.69%) and 150 µl (69.56%). While maximum adult emergence inhibition was observed at 150 µl (93.33%) with EA. Cowpea seeds in control dishes suffered the heaviest infestation (31.76%) compared to EA and acetone extracts that recorded zero infestation at 100 and 150 µl concentration respectively. Susceptibility of cowpea seeds treated with extracts was significantly lower compared to control with 100%infestation.Limitations: No hindrances was encountered during the study. Originality/Value: The study revealed that A. difformis possesses oviposition deterrent and adult emergence inhibition properties against C. maculatus that can be utilize for the management of C. maculatus in stored cowpea seeds. Further studies are recommended for exploring the active compound responsible for its insecticidal activities and toxicological effect using albino rats as a model.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract toxicity to C. maculatus increased with concentration.

Treatment
extractse1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
toxic to C. maculatuse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“All extracts were significantly toxic to C. maculatus as concentration increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethyl acetate extract caused the highest C. maculatus mortality, 90-100%.

Treatment
Ethyl acetate (EA) extracte1
Outcome
mortalitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
90-100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethyl acetate (EA) extract exerted highest mortality ranged 90-100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extract produced highest pest longevity.

Treatment
methanole1
Outcome
longevitye1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“methanol recorded highest longevity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EA extract reduced eggs laid by 51.44-74.45%.

Treatment
EA extracte1
Outcome
egg laide1
Direction
reductione1
Value
51.44-74.45%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum reduction in egg laid was observed with EA extract (51.44-74.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extract at 100 µl reduced eggs laid by 58.69%.

Treatment
methanol extract at 100e1
Value
58.69%e1

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“methanol extract at 100 (58.69%) and 150 µl (69.56%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extract at 150 µl reduced eggs laid by 69.56%.

Treatment
methanol extract at 100 (58.69%) and 150 µle1
Outcome
egg laide1
Direction
reductione1
Value
69.56%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum reduction in egg laid was observed with EA extract (51.44-74.45%), followed by methanol extract at 100 (58.69%) and 150 µl (69.56%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EA at 150 µl inhibited adult emergence by 93.33%.

Treatment
150 µl (93.33%) with EAe1
Outcome
adult emergencee1
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
93.33%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum adult emergence inhibition was observed at 150 µl (93.33%) with EA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cowpea had 31.76% infestation, while EA and acetone treated seed had zero infestation at 100 and 150 µl.

Treatment
EA and acetone extractse1
Outcome
infestatione1
Direction
zero infestatione1
Value
31.76%e1
Comparator
control dishese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cowpea seeds in control dishes suffered the heaviest infestation (31.76%) compared to EA and acetone extracts that recorded zero infestation at 100 and 150 µl concentration respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract-treated cowpea was significantly less susceptible than control.

Treatment
extractse1
Outcome
Susceptibility of cowpea seedse1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
100%infestatione1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored cowpea treated with Anchomanes difformis extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Susceptibility of cowpea seeds treated with extracts was significantly lower compared to control with 100%infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1329 · show in text ↑

methanol · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ethyl acetate · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.