Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Udaipur Rock Phosphate, Single Super Phosphate and Their Combinations on Yield and Total Nutrient Uptake by a Groundnut-Maize Cropping System on the Acid Alfisols of Odisha State, India

Debasis Sarangi; Dinabandhu Jena; Gour Hari Santra

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To find out the effect of low grade Udaipur rock phosphate on yield and nutrient dynamic in groundnut- maize cropping system, a field experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with three replications and eight treatments consisting of Udaipur rock phosphate (URP), single super phosphate (SSP) alone or in combinations with different ratios including phosphorus control from 2013-14 to 2015. The soil has a loam texture, a pH of 5.18, low available nitrogen and medium phosphorus and potassium. The highest maize equivalent yield of 6293 kg ha-1 and relative agronomic efficiency (RAE) of 159% was recorded in SSP+ lime (0.2LR) treatment followed by URP+SSP (1:1). Combined application of SSP+ lime recorded higher P, Ca, Mg and S uptake by groundnut-maize cropping system. When the crops received URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratio, the RAE values were increased above the standard SSP treatment (T3) being 102% for groundnut, 105% for maize and 103% for groundnut-maize cropping system. The yield in URP+SSP mixture (1:1) was higher than for the SSP treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Thus, combined application of URP+SSP mixture (1:1) can safely be recommended in acid soils for short duration crops like maize and groundnut as against the more costly water soluble SSP fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP plus lime produced the highest maize equivalent yield, 6293 kg ha-1.

Taxon
groundnut-maizet0
Treatment
SSP+ lime (0.2LR)e0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6293 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
URP+SSP (1:1)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest maize equivalent yield of 6293 kg ha-1 and relative agronomic efficiency (RAE) of 159% was recorded in SSP+ lime (0.2LR) treatment followed by URP+SSP (1:1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP plus lime produced the highest RAE, 159%.

Taxon
groundnut-maizet0
Treatment
SSP+ lime (0.2LR)e0
Outcome
relative agronomic efficiency (RAE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
159%e0
Comparator
URP+SSP (1:1)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest maize equivalent yield of 6293 kg ha-1 and relative agronomic efficiency (RAE) of 159% was recorded in SSP+ lime (0.2LR) treatment followed by URP+SSP (1:1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP plus lime increased P, Ca, Mg and S uptake.

Taxon
groundnut-maizee0
Treatment
SSP+ limee0
Outcome
P, Ca, Mg and S uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of SSP+ lime recorded higher P, Ca, Mg and S uptake by groundnut-maize cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 URP+SSP mixture gave groundnut RAE of 102% relative to SSP.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratioe0
Outcome
RAE valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
102%e0
Comparator
standard SSP treatment (T3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the crops received URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratio, the RAE values were increased above the standard SSP treatment (T3) being 102% for groundnut, 105% for maize and 103% for groundnut-maize cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 URP+SSP mixture gave maize RAE of 105% relative to SSP.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratioe0
Outcome
RAE valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
105%e0
Comparator
standard SSP treatment (T3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the crops received URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratio, the RAE values were increased above the standard SSP treatment (T3) being 102% for groundnut, 105% for maize and 103% for groundnut-maize cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 URP+SSP mixture gave system RAE of 103% relative to SSP.

Taxon
groundnut-maizee0
Treatment
URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratioe0
Outcome
RAE valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103%e0
Comparator
standard SSP treatment (T3)e0

Verbatim

e0

“When the crops received URP+SSP mixture in 1:1 ratio, the RAE values were increased above the standard SSP treatment (T3) being 102% for groundnut, 105% for maize and 103% for groundnut-maize cropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 mixture yielded more than SSP, without a statistically significant difference.

Taxon
groundnut-maizet0
Treatment
URP+SSP mixture (1:1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SSP treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield in URP+SSP mixture (1:1) was higher than for the SSP treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 1:1 URP+SSP mixture for short duration maize and groundnut on acid soils.

Taxon
maize and groundnutArachis hypogaeaZea mayse0
Outcome
combined application of URP+SSP mixture (1:1) can safely be recommendede0
Comparator
water soluble SSP fertilizere0
Setting
acid soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of URP+SSP mixture (1:1) can safely be recommended in acid soils for short duration crops like maize and groundnut as against the more costly water soluble SSP fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1331 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.