Paper · 2020 · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling

Are low humidity levels a limiting factor for spider mite control by phytoseiid predators under fluctuating climatic conditions?

G.J. Messelink; Ada Leman

9
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Low humidity levels are assumed to be an important limiting factor for biological control of spider mites by phytoseiid predatory mites, mainly because of the vulnerability of the egg stage for drought. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of several species of phythoseiid predatory mites for control of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch at low(55%) and high (80%) humidity levels on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions. In the preventive trial,the best control was achieved by Neoseiulus californicus McGregor at both humidity levels.Spider mites were completely eradicated. None of the other species of predatory mites was able to reduce spider mite densities, except Transeius montdorensis (Schicha) at the low humidity level. In the curative trial, N. californicus was again the best performing predatory mite,together with Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Spider mites were completely controlled at both humidity levels by these species. This suggests that low humidity levels during daytime do not necessarily disrupt the control of spider mites by these predators, possibly because of the humidity fluctuations between day and night. Humidity did also directly affect spider mites;densities were up to 3 times higher on plants in the greenhouse with low humidity levels than on plants with a high humidity level. This increased growth rate of spider mites at low humidity levels may be another explanation for the failure of spider mite control in practice. Yet, in order to enhance the biological control of spider mites at low humidity levels, it might be better to focus on methods that support the establishment of effective spider mite predators, rather than selecting drought adapted strains of predatory mites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neoseiulus californicus gave the best control of spider mites at both humidity levels in the preventive trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
Neoseiulus californicus McGregore1
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
Neoseiulus californicus McGregorNeoseiulus californicuse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
best controle1
Direction
beste1
Qualifier
at both humidity levelse1
Setting
greenhousee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neoseiulus californicus
Neoseiulus californicus · Second interactor余世文 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch at low(55%) and high (80%) humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–392 · show in text ↑
e1

“the best control was achieved by Neoseiulus californicus McGregor at both humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–634 · show in text ↑
e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider mites were completely eradicated by Neoseiulus californicus in the preventive trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
Neoseiulus californicus McGregore1
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
Spider mitese2
Direction
completely eradicatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch at low(55%) and high (80%) humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–392 · show in text ↑
e1

“the best control was achieved by Neoseiulus californicus McGregor at both humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–634 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spider mites were completely eradicated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–674 · show in text ↑
e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the other predatory mite species reduced spider mite densities in the preventive trial, except as noted for T. montdorensis.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
other species of predatory mitese3
Outcome
spider mite densitiese3
Direction
reducee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“None of the other species of predatory mites was able to reduce spider mite densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–761 · show in text ↑
e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transeius montdorensis reduced spider mite densities at the low humidity level in the preventive trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
Transeius montdorensis (Schicha)e4
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
Transeius montdorensis (Schicha)Transeius montdorensise4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spider mite densitiese3
Direction
reducee3
Qualifier
at the low humidity levele4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch at low(55%) and high (80%) humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–392 · show in text ↑
e3

“None of the other species of predatory mites was able to reduce spider mite densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–761 · show in text ↑
e4

“except Transeius montdorensis (Schicha) at the low humidity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–828 · show in text ↑
e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neoseiulus californicus was again the best performing predatory mite in the curative trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
N. californicuse6
Interactor
N. californicusNeoseiulus californicuse6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
best performing predatory mitee6
Direction
best performinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neoseiulus californicus
Neoseiulus californicus · Interactor余世文 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
e6

“N. californicus was again the best performing predatory mite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytoseiulus persimilis, with N. californicus, completely controlled spider mites at both humidity levels in the curative trial.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriote7
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-HenriotPhytoseiulus persimilise7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Spider mitese6
Direction
completely controllede6
Qualifier
at both humidity levelse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytoseiulus persimilis
Phytoseiulus persimilis · Second interactorMick Talbot · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch at low(55%) and high (80%) humidity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–392 · show in text ↑
e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
e7

“together with Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–966 · show in text ↑
e6

“Spider mites were completely controlled at both humidity levels by these species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider mite densities were up to 3 times higher on plants with low humidity than on plants with high humidity in the greenhouse.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
low humidity levelse6
Interactor
spider mitesTetranychidaee7pest
Outcome
densitiese6
Direction
highere6
Value
up to 3 timese6
Comparator
high humidity levele6
Setting
greenhousee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
e6

“densities were up to 3 times higher on plants in the greenhouse with low humidity levels than on plants with a high humidity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1425 · show in text ↑
e7

“Humidity did also directly affect spider mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1294 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Methods that support the establishment of effective spider mite predators should be preferred over selecting drought-adapted predatory mite strains.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Outcome
focus on methods that support the establishment of effective spider mite predatorse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
e6

“it might be better to focus on methods that support the establishment of effective spider mite predators, rather than selecting drought adapted strains of predatory mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1830 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low humidity levels during daytime do not necessarily disrupt spider mite control by these predators.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse5
Treatment
low humidity levels during daytimee6
Outcome
control of spider mitese6
Direction
do not necessarily disrupte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“on greenhouse cucumber in two greenhouse trials where predators were released either before or after spider mite introductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–519 · show in text ↑
e6

“low humidity levels during daytime do not necessarily disrupt the control of spider mites by these predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1177 · show in text ↑

Neoseiulus californicus · Tetranychus urticae · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Phytoseiulus persimilis · Tetranychus urticae · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.