Paper · 2007 · Acarines: Journal of the Egyptian Society of Acarology /Acarines: Journal of the Egyptian Society of Acarology

Control Measures of Tetranychs urticae Koch on Two Cucumber Cultivars in Plastic Houses

M. Hassan; Fatma Ali; A. Hussein; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biological control of Tetranychus urticae Koch different stages on two cucumber cultivars (Sahm & Heikal) grown inplastic houses in Nubaria District, Beheira Governorate, during 2004&2005 seasons was studied. Four predatorphytoseiid mites; Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks), Neoseiulus californicus (McG.), N. cucumeris (Oudemans), and N.zaheri (Yousef and El-Borolossy) were used against T. urticae different stages. N. californicus and P. macropilis gavethe highest reduction percentages of T. urticae different stages (97.36 & 97.51 % adults; 98.49 & 98.45% immaturesand 99.36& 98.59% eggs) in Sahm cultivar, while in Heikal cultivar the percentages were 87.14 & 92.50 %; 98.50 &97.38 % and 97.87&97.85%, respectively during 2004. Similar results were obtained, during 2005. Chemical control byspraying the two compounds Vertemic & Ortus proved that Vertemic was the best in reducing T. urticae different stagesby 89.55, 95.37 & 94.00% of the aforementioned successive prey stages. Integrated pest control, showed that releasingN. californicus and P. macropilis after spraying Vertemic gave in general the high reduction of T. urticae differentstages but less than Vertemic alone. However using the two predators alone and not integrated with acaricides gave thehighest reduction percentages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neoseiulus californicus reduced adult T. urticae on Sahm cucumber by 97.36%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Sahme0
Treatment
N. californicuse0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
N. californicusNeoseiulus californicuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. urticae different stagese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
97.36e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neoseiulus californicus
Neoseiulus californicus · Second interactor余世文 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. californicus and P. macropilis gavethe highest reduction percentages of T. urticae different stages (97.36 & 97.51 % adults; 98.49 & 98.45% immaturesand 99.36& 98.59% eggs) in Sahm cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytoseiulus macropilis reduced adult T. urticae on Sahm cucumber by 97.51%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Sahme0
Treatment
P. macropilise0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
P. macropilisPhytoseiulus macropilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. urticae different stagese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
97.51 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. californicus and P. macropilis gavethe highest reduction percentages of T. urticae different stages (97.36 & 97.51 % adults; 98.49 & 98.45% immaturesand 99.36& 98.59% eggs) in Sahm cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predators alone gave the highest reduction of T. urticae compared with integration with acaricides.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
two predators alonee0
Outcome
reduction percentagese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
integrated with acaricidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However using the two predators alone and not integrated with acaricides gave thehighest reduction percentages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vertemic reduced T. urticae stages more than Ortus.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Vertemice0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
T. urticae different stagese0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
Ortuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying the two compounds Vertemic & Ortus proved that Vertemic was the best in reducing T. urticae different stagesby 89.55, 95.37 & 94.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59 · show in text ↑

Neoseiulus californicus · Tetranychus urticae · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.