Paper · 2016 · PubMed

[Identification and phytotoxic activity of fungus QTYC-51 from the gut of Pantala flavescens larvae].

Liping Jin; Yun Zhang; Xiao Xu; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective: To isolate the fungus with phytotoxic activity from the gut of Pantala flavescens larvae. Methods: Strain QTYC-51 was identified by morphological observation and 5.8S rDNA-ITS sequence analysis. Petri dish bioassay was used to test the phytotoxic activity of fermentation broth and monomer compounds of strain QTYC-51 on Echinochloa crusgalli and Amaranthus retroflexus. Bioactive components were isolated from ethyl acetate extracts via chromatographic methods, and the structures were determined by mass spectrum and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses. Results: QTYC-51 was identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.. The fermentation broth had good phytotoxic activity on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 76.9% and 56.5%, respectively. Five monomer compounds were purified from the fermentation products, including 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, 1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e]oxepin-6,11-dione, hydroxyvertixanthone, globosuxanthone and 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxyanthraquinone. At the concentration of 100 μg/mL, compound globosuxanthone was found to possess obvious phytotoxic effects on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 94.1% and 79.0%, respectively, which were comparable to that of positive control 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Compound 1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dione showed potent phytotoxic activity against E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with inhibition rates of 50.3% and 58.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Strain QTYC-51 could be potentially developed as a microbial herbicide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QTYC-51 was identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.

Taxon
Paraconiothyrium sp.Paraconiothyriume0
Outcome
identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paraconiothyrium
Paraconiothyrium · TaxonJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“QTYC-51 was identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation broth inhibited E. crusgalli radical growth by 76.9%.

Taxon
E. crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0
Treatment
fermentation brothe0
Outcome
radical growth of E. crusgallie0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
76.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fermentation broth had good phytotoxic activity on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 76.9% and 56.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation broth inhibited A. retroflexus radical growth by 56.5%.

Taxon
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
fermentation brothe0
Outcome
radical growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
56.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fermentation broth had good phytotoxic activity on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 76.9% and 56.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five compounds were purified from QTYC-51 fermentation products.

Taxon
Paraconiothyrium sp.Paraconiothyriume1
Outcome
Five monomer compounds were purifiede0
Value
Five monomer compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paraconiothyrium
Paraconiothyrium · TaxonJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five monomer compounds were purified from the fermentation products, including 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, 1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e]oxepin-6,11-dione, hydroxyvertixanthone, globosuxanthone and 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxyanthraquinone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“QTYC-51 was identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Globosuxanthone inhibited E. crusgalli radical growth by 94.1% at 100 μg/mL.

Taxon
E. crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0
Treatment
100 μg/mL, compound globosuxanthonee0
Outcome
radical growth of E. crusgallie0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
94.1%e0
Comparator
positive control 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the concentration of 100 μg/mL, compound globosuxanthone was found to possess obvious phytotoxic effects on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 94.1% and 79.0%, respectively, which were comparable to that of positive control 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Globosuxanthone inhibited A. retroflexus radical growth by 79.0% at 100 μg/mL.

Taxon
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
100 μg/mL, compound globosuxanthonee0
Outcome
radical growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
79.0%e0
Comparator
positive control 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the concentration of 100 μg/mL, compound globosuxanthone was found to possess obvious phytotoxic effects on radical growth of E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with the inhibition rates of 94.1% and 79.0%, respectively, which were comparable to that of positive control 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dione inhibited E. crusgalli growth by 50.3%.

Taxon
E. crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0
Treatment
1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dionee0
Outcome
phytotoxic activity against E. crusgallie0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
50.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compound 1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dione showed potent phytotoxic activity against E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with inhibition rates of 50.3% and 58.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dione inhibited A. retroflexus growth by 58.6%.

Taxon
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dionee0
Outcome
phytotoxic activitye0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
58.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compound 1-hydroxy-10-methoxy-dibenz[b,e] oxepin-6,11-dione showed potent phytotoxic activity against E. crusgalli and A. retroflexus with inhibition rates of 50.3% and 58.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1515 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose QTYC-51 as a potential microbial herbicide.

Taxon
Paraconiothyrium sp.Paraconiothyriume1
Outcome
developed as a microbial herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Paraconiothyrium
Paraconiothyrium · TaxonJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain QTYC-51 could be potentially developed as a microbial herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1599 · show in text ↑
e1

“QTYC-51 was identified as Paraconiothyrium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–622 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyard grass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · growth · Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot amaranth)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.